Colitis ulcerosa
Studienlage · Detail Meta-Analyse (Systematische Review) · Colitis ulcerosa · 2020

Evidence supporting the benefits of Cannabis for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis is extremely limited: a meta-analysis of the literatureEvidence supporting the benefits of Cannabis for Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis is extremely limited: a meta-analysis of the literature

Kein Nutzen nachgewiesen GRADE Moderat 10 Zitate
Stichprobek = 1 Studien
n = 60 Pat.
KontrollePlacebo oder Standardtherapie
EndpunktKlinische Remissionsrate
Verblindungunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse (Systematische Review)
Kernaussage

Cannabis zeigte gegenüber Placebo/Standardtherapie keinen signifikanten Nutzen bei klinischer Remission oder Response bei Morbus Crohn oder Colitis ulcerosa.

Zusammenfassung

Meta-Analyse zu Cannabis bei Colitis ulcerosa; k=1 RCT (n=60: 29 Cannabis, 31 Placebo); kein Unterschied bei Remissionsversagen (RR 1.02, 95%CI 0.76-1.37) oder Ansprechen (RR 0.99, 95%CI 0.65-1.21); UAW traten bei allen Cannabis-Patienten auf (RR 1.28, 95%CI 1.05-1.56); GRADE-Evidenz niedrig bis sehr niedrig.

P
PopulationErwachsene mit chronisch-entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen (Morbus Crohn und Colitis ulcerosa), gepoolt n=100
I
InterventionMedizinisches Cannabis/Cannabis (verschiedene Applikationen)
C
KontrollePlacebo oder Standardtherapie
O
OutcomeKein signifikanter Unterschied bei klinischer Remission oder Response für UC (RR 1.02, 95%-KI 0.76–1.37) oder Morbus Crohn (RR 0.72, 95%-KI 0.47–1.12); erhöhte unerwünschte Ereignisse unter Cannabis bei UC (RR 1.28, 95%-KI 1.05–1.56)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Moderat

Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.

Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung
Effektstärke Kein Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Desmarais A
DOI 10.20524/aog.2020.0516
Design: Meta-Analyse (Systematische Review)
Teilen
Abstract
<h4>Background</h4>Medical Cannabis is increasingly used to control inflammation and pain in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the effect of Cannabis on the clinical response, induction of clinical remission, and maintenance of clinical remission compared to placebo/standard of care.<h4>Methods</h4>We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science in June 2019, for cannabis/Cannabis and IBD, Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis (UC). The statistical analysis was performed using Revman (version 5.3). GRADE methodology was used to assess the quality of the evidence.<h4>Results</h4>Of the 334 studies initially reviewed, 1 trial in UC and 2 trials in Crohn's disease met eligibility. For UC, 29 patients were treated with Cannabis and 31 with placebo/standard of care. There was no difference in failure to achieve clinical remission (relative risk [RR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76-1.37) or response (RR 0.99, 95%CI 0.65-1.21). Adverse events occurred in all patients receiving Cannabis (RR 1.28, 95%CI 1.05-1.56). For Crohn's disease, 21 patients were treated with Cannabis and 19 with placebo/standard of care. There was no difference in failure to achieve clinical remission (RR 0.72, 95%CI 0.47-1.12) or failure to achieve clinical response (RR 0.15, 95%CI 0.02-1.05). Adverse events were not reported per patient. The quality of evidence was low to very low using GRADE methodology.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Data supporting the use of Cannabis for the management of IBD are extremely limited. Further well-designed studies are needed before any positive conclusions regarding Cannabis use can be drawn.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel