Colitis ulcerosa
Studienlage · Detail RCT · Colitis ulcerosa · 2018

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Pilot Study of Cannabidiol-rich Botanical Extract in the Symptomatic Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis

Gemischt GRADE Moderat 158 Zitate
Stichproben = 29 Pat.
Dauer10 Wochen
KontrollePlacebo-Kapseln
EndpunktRemissionsrate
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidvollspektrum
Applikationoral
Kernaussage

Primärer Endpunkt (Remissionsrate) nicht erreicht (CBD 28% vs. Placebo 26%), aber sekundäre Analysen zeigten Vorteile der CBD-reichen Extrakt bei Mayo-Scores und subjektiven Parametern.

Zusammenfassung

n=29 Colitis ulcerosa, 10 Wochen CBD-reicher Cannabis-Extrakt (2×50 mg CBD oral) vs. Placebo; kein signifikanter Unterschied im primären Endpunkt (klinische Remission: 28% CBD vs. 26% Placebo, p=0.97); Lebensqualität (IBDQ) nicht-signifikant verbessert (p=0.36); gut toleriert.

P
PopulationErwachsene ≥18 Jahre mit linksseitiger oder ausgedehnter Colitis ulcerosa, Mayo-Score 4-10 (Endoskopie-Score ≥1), stabile 5-ASA-Therapie, n nicht im Abstract spezifiziert
I
InterventionCBD-reicher botanischer Extrakt (Kapseln), 10 Wochen, Dosis nicht im Abstract angegeben
C
KontrollePlacebo-Kapseln
O
OutcomePrimärer Endpunkt (Remissionsrate) negativ: CBD 28% vs. Placebo 26%, n.s. Per-Protocol-Analyse zeigt Trend für Mayo-Scores (p=0.068/0.038) und Lebensqualität (p=0.003-0.069) zugunsten CBD
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Moderat

Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.

Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung Doppelblind
Effektstärke Gemischt
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Irving P M, Iqbal T, Nwokolo C et al.
DOI 10.1093/ibd/izy002
Design: RCT
Teilen
Abstract
Background: Cannabidiol (CBD) exhibits anti-inflammatory properties that could improve disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease. This proof-of-concept study assessed efficacy, safety and tolerability of CBD-rich botanical extract in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older, with left-sided or extensive UC, Mayo scores of 4-10 (endoscopy scores ≥1), and on stable 5-aminosalicylic acid dosing, were randomized to 10-weeks' CBD-rich botanical extract or placebo capsules. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients in remission after treatment. Statistical testing was 2-sided, using a 10% significance level. Results: Patients were less tolerant of CBD-rich botanical extract compared with placebo, taking on average one-third fewer capsules, and having more compliance-related protocol deviations (principally insufficient exposure), prompting identification of a per protocol (PP) analysis set. The primary endpoint was negative; end of treatment remission rates were similar for CBD-rich botanical extract (28%) and placebo (26%). However, PP analysis of total and partial Mayo scores favoured CBD-rich botanical extract (P = 0.068 and P = 0.038, respectively). Additionally, PP analyses of the more subjective physician's global assessment of illness severity, subject global impression of change, and patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes were improved for patients taking CBD-rich botanical extract (P = 0.069, P = 0.003, and P = 0.065, respectively). Adverse events (AEs) were predominantly mild/moderate with many in the CBD-rich botanical extract group potentially attributable to the ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol content. A greater proportion of gastrointestinal-related AEs, indicative of UC worsening, was seen on placebo. Conclusion: Although the primary endpoint was not reached, several signals suggest CBD-rich botanical extract may be beneficial for symptomatic treatment of UC.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel