Jugend & Entwicklung
Studienlage · Detail Prospektive Kohortenstudie (Longitudinale Latent-Class-Analyse) · Jugend & Entwicklung · 2018

Association of Combined Patterns of Tobacco and Cannabis Use in Adolescence With Psychotic Experiences.

Gemischt GRADE Niedrig 63 Zitate
Stichproben = 5.300 Pat.
DauerDaten erhoben ab 6. September…
KontrolleNichtkonsumierende
EndpunktPsychotische Erlebnisse
Verblindungn.a.
DesignProspektive Kohortenstudie (Longitudinale Latent-Class-Analyse)
Kernaussage

Cannabiskonsum im Jugendalter erhöht das Risiko psychotischer Erlebnisse robust, Tabakkonsum allein zeigt nach Adjustierung keinen signifikanten Zusammenhang.

Zusammenfassung

ALSPAC-Kohorte (n=5.300, JAMA Psychiatry): Frühzeitiger Cannabiskonsum in der Adoleszenz (Beginn <16 Jahre) assoziiert mit erhöhtem Psychose-Risiko (OR=3,70, 95% CI 1,66–8,25 nach Adjustierung); Spätbeginn-Konsum (OR=2,97, 95% CI 1,63–5,40); Tabak-Effekte nicht robust (OR 1,78, 95% CI 0,54–5,88 nach Adjustierung ns); Befunde belegen stärkere epidemiologische Evidenz für Cannabisrisiken bei Jugendlichen als für Tabak.

P
PopulationJugendliche aus der Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC), n=5.300, mit mindestens 3 Messungen zu Zigaretten- und Cannabiskonsum im Alter von 14–19 Jahren
I
InterventionLongitudinale Muster von Tabak- und/oder Cannabiskonsum im Jugendalter (latente Klassen: früher Zigaretten-only-Konsum, früher Cannabiskonsum, später Cannabiskonsum, später Zigaretten-only-Konsum)
C
KontrolleNichtkonsumierende (65,9% der Stichprobe)
O
OutcomeFrüher Cannabiskonsum (adj. OR 3,70; 95%-KI 1,66–8,25) und später Cannabiskonsum (adj. OR 2,97; 95%-KI 1,63–5,40) signifikant mit psychotischen Erlebnissen assoziiert; früher Zigaretten-only-Konsum nach Confounder-Adjustierung nicht mehr signifikant (adj. OR 1,78; 95%-KI 0,54–5,88)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Niedrig

Zweite von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist begrenzt verlässlich.

Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung
Effektstärke Gemischt
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Jones HJ, Gage SH, Heron J, Hickman M, Lewis G, Munafò MR, Zammit S.
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4271
Design: Prospektive Kohortenstudie (Longitudinale Latent-Class-Analyse)
Teilen
Abstract
<h4>Importance</h4>There is concern about potentially causal effects of tobacco use on psychosis, but epidemiological studies have been less robust in attempts to minimize effects of confounding than studies of cannabis use have been.<h4>Objectives</h4>To examine the association of patterns of cigarette and cannabis use with preceding and subsequent psychotic experiences, and to compare effects of confounding across these patterns.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>This cohort study used data from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, which initially consisted of 14 062 children. Data were collected periodically from September 6, 1990, with collection ongoing, and analyzed from August 8, 2016, through June 14, 2017. Cigarette and cannabis use data were summarized using longitudinal latent class analysis to identify longitudinal classes of substance use. Associations between classes and psychotic experiences at age 18 years were assessed.<h4>Exposures</h4>Depending on the analysis model, exposures were longitudinal classes of substance use or psychotic experiences at age 12 years.<h4>Main outcomes and measures</h4>Logistic regression was used to examine the associations between substance use longitudinal classes and subsequent onset of psychotic experiences.<h4>Results</h4>Longitudinal classes were derived using 5300 participants (56.1% female) who had at least 3 measures of cigarette and cannabis use from ages 14 to 19 years. Prior to adjusting for a range of potential confounders, there was strong evdience that early-onset cigarette-only use (4.3%), early-onset cannabis use (3.2%), and late-onset cannabis use (11.9%) (but not later-onset cigarette-only use [14.8%]) latent classes were associated with increased psychotic experiences compared with nonusers (65.9%) (omnibus P < .001). After adjusting for confounders, the association for early-onset cigarette-only use attenuated substantially (unadjusted odds ratio [OR], 3.03; 95% CI, 1.13-8.14; adjusted OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 0.54-5.88), whereas those for early-onset cannabis use (adjusted OR, 3.70; 95% CI, 1.66-8.25) and late-onset cannabis use (adjusted OR, 2.97; 95% CI, 1.63-5.40) remained consistent.<h4>Conclusions and relevance</h4>In this study, our findings indicate that while individuals who use cannabis or cigarettes during adolescence have an increased risk of subsequent psychotic experiences, epidemiological evidence is substantively more robust for cannabis use than it is for tobacco use.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel