Chronischer Schmerz
Studienlage · Detail Systematic Review · Chronischer Schmerz · 2022

Cannabis-Based Products for Chronic Pain

Gemischt GRADE Hoch 129 Zitate
Stichprobek = 18 Studien
n = 1.740 Pat.
Dauer1 to 6 months
KontrollePlacebo
EndpunktSchmerzintensität
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignSystematic Review
Kernaussage

Synthetische Produkte mit hohem THC-zu-CBD-Verhältnis zeigten möglicherweise moderate Schmerzbesserung, aber erhöhte Risiken für Sedation und Schwindel; sublinguales Spray mit vergleichbarem THC-zu-CBD-Verhältnis wahrscheinlich mit kleiner Schmerzbesserung assoziiert, aber erhöhte Nebenwirkungsrisiken.

Zusammenfassung

Systematische Review über k=18 RCTs (n=1.740, überwiegend 1–6 Monate) + 7 Kohortenstudien (n=13.095) zu Cannabinoiden bei chronischem Schmerz; 56% neuropathischer Schmerz. Synthetische High-THC-Produkte (>98% THC) können Schmerzintensität moderat verbessern (≥30% Response) mit erhöhtem Sedierungs-Risiko und wahrscheinlich großem Schwindel-Risiko. Sublinguales 1.1:1 THC:CBD-Spray wahrscheinlich assoziiert mit kleiner Schmerzverbesserung und kann großes Schwindel-/Sedierungs-Risiko sowie moderates Übelkeits-Risiko erhöhen. Evidenz für andere Produkte und Langzeit-Harms unzureichend.

P
PopulationErwachsene mit chronischem Schmerz (überwiegend neuropathischer Schmerz), gepoolt n=14.835 (RCTs n=1.740, Kohorten n=13.095)
I
InterventionCannabinoide (synthetisch/Extrakt/Ganzkraut) mit variierendem THC:CBD-Verhältnis, oral/sublingual, Dauer ≥1 Monat
C
KontrollePlacebo (RCTs)
O
OutcomeSynthetische High-THC-Produkte: moderate Schmerzreduktion; Nabiximols-Spray (THC:CBD ≈1:1): geringe Verbesserung in Schmerzintensität und Funktion; alle Produkte mit erhöhtem Risiko für Schwindel und Sedierung
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Hoch

Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.

Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung Doppelblind
Effektstärke Gemischt
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
McDonagh M S, Morasco B J, Wagner J et al.
DOI 10.7326/m21-4520
Design: Systematic Review
Teilen
Abstract
Background: Contemporary data are needed about the utility of cannabinoids in chronic pain. Purpose: To evaluate the benefits and harms of cannabinoids for chronic pain. Data Sources: Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus to January 2022. Study Selection: English-language, randomized, placebo-controlled trials and cohort studies (>/=1 month duration) of cannabinoids for chronic pain. Data Extraction: Data abstraction, risk of bias, and strength of evidence assessments were dually reviewed. Cannabinoids were categorized by THC-to-CBD ratio (high, comparable, or low) and source (synthetic, extract or purified, or whole plant). Data Synthesis: Eighteen randomized, placebo-controlled trials (n = 1740) and 7 cohort studies (n = 13 095) assessed cannabinoids. Studies were primarily short term (1 to 6 months); 56% enrolled patients with neuropathic pain, with 3% to 89% female patients. Synthetic products with high THC-to-CBD ratios (>98% THC) may be associated with moderate improvement in pain severity and response (>/=30% improvement) and an increased risk for sedation and are probably associated with a large increased risk for dizziness. Extracted products with high THC-to-CBD ratios (range, 3:1 to 47:1) may be associated with large increased risk for study withdrawal due to adverse events and dizziness. Sublingual spray with comparable THC-to-CBD ratio (1.1:1) probably is associated with small improvement in pain severity and overall function and may be associated with large increased risk for dizziness and sedation and moderate increased risk for nausea. Evidence for other products and outcomes, including longer-term harms, were not reported or were insufficient. Limitation: Variation in interventions; lack of study details, including unclear availability in the United States; and inadequate evidence for some products. Conclusion: Oral, synthetic cannabis products with high THC-to-CBD ratios and sublingual, extracted cannabis products with comparable THC-to-CBD ratios may be associated with short-term improvements in chronic pain and increased risk for dizziness and sedation. Studies are needed on long-term outcomes and further evaluation of product formulation effects. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (PROSPERO: CRD42021229579).

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel