Smoked cannabis for chronic neuropathic pain: a randomized controlled trial
Ware et al.·Canadian Medical Association JournalImpact 1.4
Klarer NutzenGRADEModerat442 Zitate
Stichproben = 23 Pat.
Dauervier 14-Tage-Perioden
KontrollePlacebo-Cannabis
EndpunktNRS
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT (cross-over)
Cannabinoidthc
Max. Dosis75.0 mg
Applikationinhalativ
”Kernaussage
Cannabis mit 9,4% THC reduzierte die Schmerzintensität signifikant um 0,7 Punkte (5,4 vs. 6,1) und verbesserte Schlafqualität und Einschlafzeit, war aber mit Kopfschmerzen und anderen Nebenwirkungen assoziiert.
Zusammenfassung
Crossover-RCT, n=23 (21 completers) mit post-traumatischem oder postoperativem neuropathischem Schmerz. Inhaliertes Cannabis (0%, 2.5%, 6%, 9.4% THC) über vier 14-Tage-Zyklen (3×25 mg/Tag für 5 Tage, 9-Tage-Washout). Primärer Kontrast 9.4% vs. 0% THC: durchschnittliche Schmerzintensität (11-Punkte-Skala) 5.4 vs. 6.1 (Differenz=0.7, 95% CI 0.02–1.4, p<0.05). Verbesserter Schlaf (leichteres Einschlafen p=0.001, schneller p<0.001, weniger Wachphasen p=0.01). Häufigste Nebenwirkungen bei 9.4% THC: Kopfschmerzen, trockene Augen, Brennen, Schwindel.
P
PopulationErwachsene mit post-traumatischer oder postoperativer Neuropathie, n=23 (21 Completers), mittleres Alter 45,4 Jahre
I
InterventionGerauchtes Cannabis 0%, 2,5%, 6% und 9,4% THC, 25 mg Einzeldosis 3×/Tag für 5 Tage je Periode
C
KontrollePlacebo-Cannabis (0% THC)
O
OutcomeMittlere tägliche Schmerzintensität signifikant reduziert für 9,4% vs. 0% THC (5,4 vs. 6,1; Differenz 0,7; 95%-KI 0,02–1,4)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Sehr niedrigNiedrigModeratHoch
Moderat
Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.
Background: Chronic neuropathic pain affects 1%-2% of the adult population and is often refractory to standard pharmacologic treatment. Patients with chronic pain have reported using smoked cannabis to relieve pain, improve sleep and improve mood.
Methods: Adults with post-traumatic or postsurgical neuropathic pain were randomly assigned to receive cannabis at four potencies (0%, 2.5%, 6% and 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol) over four 14-day periods in a crossover trial. Participants inhaled a single 25-mg dose through a pipe three times daily for the first five days in each cycle, followed by a nine-day washout period. Daily average pain intensity was measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale. We recorded effects on mood, sleep and quality of life, as well as adverse events.
Results: We recruited 23 participants (mean age 45.4 [standard deviation 12.3] years, 12 women [52%]), of whom 21 completed the trial. The average daily pain intensity, measured on the 11-point numeric rating scale, was lower on the prespecified primary contrast of 9.4% v. 0% tetrahydrocannabinol (5.4 v. 6.1, respectively; difference = 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-1.4). Preparations with intermediate potency yielded intermediate but nonsignificant degrees of relief. Participants receiving 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol reported improved ability to fall asleep (easier, p = 0.001; faster, p < 0.001; more drowsy, p = 0.003) and improved quality of sleep (less wakefulness, p = 0.01) relative to 0% tetrahydrocannabinol. We found no differences in mood or quality of life. The most common drug-related adverse events during the period when participants received 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol were headache, dry eyes, burning sensation in areas of neuropathic pain, dizziness, numbness and cough.
Conclusion: A single inhalation of 25 mg of 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol herbal cannabis three times daily for five days reduced the intensity of pain, improved sleep and was well tolerated. Further long-term safety and efficacy studies are indicated. (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register no. ISRCTN68314063).