Multiple Sklerose
Studienlage · Detail Meta-Analyse · Multiple Sklerose · 2010

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of Sativex (nabiximols), on spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis.

Klarer Nutzen GRADE Hoch 151 Zitate
Stichprobek = 3 Studien
n = 666 Pat.
Dauerunklar
KontrollePlacebo
EndpunktNRS/VAS
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignMeta-Analyse
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Applikationoromukosal
Kernaussage

Nabiximols zeigte eine statistisch signifikante Reduktion der Spastizität gegenüber Placebo mit einem Unterschied von -0,32 Punkten auf der numerischen Ratingskala (p=0,026) und eine höhere Quote von Respondern (OR 1,62, p=0,0073).

Zusammenfassung

Meta-Analyse über k=3 randomisierte, Placebo-kontrollierte Doppelblindstudien (n=666) zu Nabiximols (Sativex) bei MS-Spastik; NRS-Differenz gegenüber Placebo -0,32 (95% CI -0,61 bis -0,04; p=0,026); Responderrate (≥30% Verbesserung) OR=1,62 (95% CI 1,15–2,28; p=0,0073). Nabiximols gut verträglich, Nebenwirkungen überwiegend leicht bis moderat.

P
PopulationErwachsene mit Multipler Sklerose und Spastik, gepoolt n=666
I
InterventionNabiximols (Sativex), oromukosales Spray, THC/CBD-Kombination
C
KontrollePlacebo
O
OutcomeMittlere NRS-Reduktion: −1,30 (Nabiximols) vs. −0,97 (Placebo), Differenz −0,32 (95% CI −0,61; −0,04; p=0,026); Responder-Rate OR=1,62 (95% CI 1,15–2,28; p=0,0073)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Hoch

Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.

Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung Doppelblind
Effektstärke Klarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Wade DT, Collin C, Stott C, Duncombe P
DOI 10.1177/1352458510367462
Design: Meta-Analyse
Teilen
Abstract
To determine the efficacy of Sativex (USAN: nabiximols) in the alleviation of spasticity in people with multiple sclerosis. The results from three randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind parallel group studies were combined for analysis. 666 patients with multiple sclerosis and spasticity. A 0-100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS, transformed to a 0-10 scale) or a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (0-10 NRS) was used to measure spasticity. Patients achieving a >/=30% improvement from baseline in their spasticity score were defined as 'responders'. Global impression of change (GIC) at the end of treatment was also recorded. The patient populations were similar. The adjusted mean change of the numerical rating scale from baseline in the treated group was -1.30 compared with -0.97 for placebo. Using a linear model, the treatment difference was -0.32 (95% CI -0.61, -0.04, p = 0.026). A statistically significant greater proportion of treated patients were responders (odds ratio (OR) = 1.62, 95% CI 1.15, 2.28; p = 0.0073) and treated patients also reported greater improvement: odds ratio 1.67 (95% CI 1.05, 2.65; p = 0.030). High numbers of subjects experienced at least one adverse event, but most were mild to moderate in severity and all drug-related serious adverse events resolved. The meta-analysis demonstrates that nabiximols is well tolerated and reduces spasticity.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel