Studienlage · Detail
Klarer Nutzen
GRADE
Moderat
462 Zitate
Stichproben = 48 Pat.
DauerEinzeldosis, 210 min…
KontrolleOrales Placebo, 210 min vor intravenösem…
EndpunktPANSS positiv
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT (between-subjects, experimentell)
Cannabinoidkombination
Max. Dosis601.5 mg
Applikationoral
Kernaussage
CBD 600 mg hemmte THC-induzierte Paranoia und hippocampusabhängige Gedächtnisbeeinträchtigung signifikant gegenüber Placebo.
Zusammenfassung
n=48 gesunde Probanden (CBD n=22, Placebo n=26), orales CBD 600 mg vs. Placebo vor intravenösem THC (1,5 mg). Klinisch signifikante psychotische Positivsymptome (PANSS ≥3 Punkte Anstieg) seltener in CBD-Gruppe: OR=0,22 (χ²=4,74, p<0,05). Paranoia (SSPS) geringer in CBD-Gruppe (t=2,28, p<0,05). Episodisches Gedächtnis (HVLT-R): -0,4% CBD vs. -10,6% Placebo (t=2,39, p<0,05). Belegt Schutzwirkung von CBD gegen THC-induzierte Psychose-Risikosymptome.
P
PopulationGesunde Erwachsene, n=48 (CBD-Gruppe n=22, Placebo-Gruppe n=26)
I
InterventionOrales CBD 600 mg, 210 min vor intravenösem THC 1,5 mg
C
KontrolleOrales Placebo, 210 min vor intravenösem THC 1,5 mg
O
OutcomeGeringere klinisch signifikante positive Psychosesymptome in der CBD-Gruppe (OR=0,22, p<0,05); geringere Paranoia (SSPS, t=2,28, p<0,05); bessere episodische Gedächtnisleistung (HVLT-R: -0,4% vs. -10,6%, t=2,39, p<0,05)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Moderat
Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.
Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
★★★★★
Verblindung
Doppelblind
Effektstärke
Klarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
★★★★★
Autoren
Teilen
Abstract
Community-based studies suggest that cannabis products that are high in Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) but low in cannabidiol (CBD) are particularly hazardous for mental health. Laboratory-based studies are ideal for clarifying this issue because THC and CBD can be administered in pure form, under controlled conditions. In a between-subjects design, we tested the hypothesis that pre-treatment with CBD inhibited THC-elicited psychosis and cognitive impairment. Healthy participants were randomised to receive oral CBD 600 mg (n=22) or placebo (n=26), 210 min ahead of intravenous (IV) THC (1.5 mg). Post-THC, there were lower PANSS positive scores in the CBD group, but this did not reach statistical significance. However, clinically significant positive psychotic symptoms (defined a priori as increases ≥ 3 points) were less likely in the CBD group compared with the placebo group, odds ratio (OR)=0.22 (χ²=4.74, p<0.05). In agreement, post-THC paranoia, as rated with the State Social Paranoia Scale (SSPS), was less in the CBD group compared with the placebo group (t=2.28, p<0.05). Episodic memory, indexed by scores on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Task-revised (HVLT-R), was poorer, relative to baseline, in the placebo pre-treated group (-10.6 ± 18.9%) compared with the CBD group (-0.4% ± 9.7 %) (t=2.39, p<0.05). These findings support the idea that high-THC/low-CBD cannabis products are associated with increased risks for mental health.
„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“