Multiple Sklerose
Studienlage · Detail Kohortenstudie · Multiple Sklerose · 2016

Efficacy and safety of cannabinoid oromucosal spray for multiple sclerosis spasticity.

Klarer Nutzen GRADE Niedrig 116 Zitate
Stichproben = 1.615 Pat.
Dauer6 Monate Beobachtung
EndpunktNRS
Verblindungn.a.
DesignKohortenstudie
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Applikationoromukosal
Kernaussage

Nach einem Monat erreichten 70,5% der Patienten eine ≥20%ige Verbesserung der Spastizität; 28,2% erreichten eine klinisch relevante ≥30%ige Verbesserung mit mittlerer NRS-Reduktion von 22,6%.

Zusammenfassung

Italienisches AIFA-Register n=1615 MS-Patienten mit therapieresistenter Spastik, THC:CBD-Spray (Sativex). Nach 1 Monat: 70,5% erreichten ≥20% NRS-Verbesserung (Initial Response), 28,2% ≥30% (Clinically Relevant Response); mittlere NRS-Reduktion 22,6% (7,5→5,8). Multivariate Analyse: erhöhte IR-Wahrscheinlichkeit bei progressiver MS (OR=1,4; 95% CI 1,04–1,9; p=0,025) und Baseline-NRS >8 (OR=1,8; 95% CI 1,3–2,4; p<0,001). 39,5% Therapieabbrüche in 6 Monaten (26,2% Wirkungsverlust, 18,7% Nebenwirkungen).

P
PopulationErwachsene mit behandlungsresistenter MS-Spastik aus 30 italienischen MS-Zentren, n=1615
I
InterventionTHC:CBD-Oromukosal-Spray (Sativex), täglich, 6 Monate, Real-World-Setting
O
Outcome70,5% der Patienten erreichten nach 1 Monat eine NRS-Reduktion ≥20% (IR); 28,2% eine Reduktion ≥30% (CRR); mittlere NRS-Reduktion 22,6% (von 7,5 auf 5,8); nach 6 Monaten Abbruchrate 39,5%
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Niedrig

Zweite von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist begrenzt verlässlich.

Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung
Effektstärke Klarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Patti F, Messina S, Solaro C, Amato MP, Bergamaschi R, Bonavita S, Bruno Bossio R, Brescia Morra V, Costantino GF, Cavalla P
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2015-312591
Design: Kohortenstudie
Teilen
Abstract
Background: The approval of 9-delta-tetrahydocannabinol and cannabidiol (THC:CBD) oromucosal spray (Sativex) for the management of treatment-resistant multiple sclerosis (MS) spasticity opened a new opportunity for many patients. The aim of our study was to describe Sativex effectiveness and adverse events profile in a large population of Italian patients with MS in the daily practice setting. Methods: We collected data of all patients starting Sativex between January 2014 and February 2015 from the mandatory Italian medicines agency (AIFA) e-registry. Spasticity assessment by the 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) scale is available at baseline, after 1 month of treatment (trial period), and at 3 and 6 months. Results: A total of 1615 patients were recruited from 30 MS centres across Italy. After one treatment month (trial period), we found 70.5% of patients reaching a >/=20% improvement (initial response, IR) and 28.2% who had already reached a >/=30% improvement (clinically relevant response, CRR), with a mean NRS score reduction of 22.6% (from 7.5 to 5.8). After a multivariate analysis, we found an increased probability to reach IR at the first month among patients with primary and secondary progressive MS, (n=1169, OR 1.4 95% CI 1.04 to 1.9, p=0.025) and among patients with >8 NRS score at baseline (OR 1.8 95% CI 1.3-2.4 p<0.001). During the 6 months observation period, 631(39.5%) patients discontinued treatment. The main reasons for discontinuation were lack of effectiveness (n=375, 26.2%) and/or adverse events (n=268, 18.7%). Conclusions: Sativex can be a useful and safe option for patients with MS with moderate to severe spasticity resistant to common antispastic drugs.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel