Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicine for pain management: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
Fisher et al.·PainImpact 4.2
GemischtGRADEHoch204 Zitate
Stichprobek = 36 Studien n = 7.217 Pat.
Dauerverschiedene Behandlungsdauern
KontrollePlacebo oder aktive Kontrolle
EndpunktSchmerzreduktion ≥30%/≥50%
Verblindungunklar
DesignSystematic Review
”Kernaussage
Nutzen nur für Cannabis <7 Tage und Nabiximols >7 Tage gefunden; 81% der Subgruppenanalysen negativ; insgesamt sehr niedrige Evidenzqualität.
Zusammenfassung
Systematische Review über k=36 RCTs (n=7.217) zu Cannabinoiden, Cannabis und Cannabis-basierten Medikamenten bei Schmerz jeglicher Art. Evidenz für Benefit nur bei Cannabis <7 Tage (Risikodifferenz 0.33, 95% CI 0.20–0.46; 2 Studien, n=231, sehr niedrige Qualität) und Nabiximols >7 Tage (Risikodifferenz 0.06, 95% CI 0.01–0.12; 6 Studien, n=1.484, sehr niedrige Qualität). 81% der Subgruppen-Analysen negativ; alle Studien mit hohem/unklarem Bias-Risiko. GRADE: niedrige bis sehr niedrige Evidenzqualität.
P
PopulationPersonen jeden Alters mit Schmerzen jeder Ätiologie und Behandlungsdauer, gepoolt n=7.217
I
InterventionCannabinoide, Cannabis und cannabisbasierte Medikamente (CBM), verschiedene Applikationsformen
C
KontrollePlacebo oder aktive Kontrolle
O
OutcomeBegrenzte Evidenz für Nutzen: Cannabis <7 Tage (RD 0,33; 95%-KI 0,20–0,46; 2 Trials, n=231; sehr niedrige Qualität) und Nabiximols >7 Tage (RD 0,06; 95%-KI 0,01–0,12; 6 Trials, n=1.484; sehr niedrige Qualität); 81% der Subgruppenanalysen negativ; mehr unerwünschte Ereignisse unter Cannabis, Nabiximols und THC vs. Kontrolle
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Sehr niedrigNiedrigModeratHoch
Hoch
Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.
Cannabinoids, cannabis, and cannabis-based medicines (CBMs) are increasingly used to manage pain, with limited understanding of their efficacy and safety. We summarised efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of these types of drugs for treating pain using randomised controlled trials: in people of any age, with any type of pain, and for any treatment duration. Primary outcomes were 30% and 50% reduction in pain intensity, and AEs. We assessed risk of bias of included studies, and the overall quality of evidence using GRADE. Studies of <7 and >7 days treatment duration were analysed separately. We included 36 studies (7217 participants) delivering cannabinoids (8 studies), cannabis (6 studies), and CBM (22 studies); all had high and/or uncertain risk of bias. Evidence of benefit was found for cannabis <7 days (risk difference 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.20-0.46; 2 trials, 231 patients, very low-quality evidence) and nabiximols >7 days (risk difference 0.06, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.12; 6 trials, 1484 patients, very low-quality evidence). No other beneficial effects were found for other types of cannabinoids, cannabis, or CBM in our primary analyses; 81% of subgroup analyses were negative. Cannabis, nabiximols, and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol had more AEs than control. Studies in this field have unclear or high risk of bias, and outcomes had GRADE rating of low- or very low-quality evidence. We have little confidence in the estimates of effect. The evidence neither supports nor refutes claims of efficacy and safety for cannabinoids, cannabis, or CBM in the management of pain.