Studienlage · Detail
Klarer Nutzen
GRADE
Hoch
143 Zitate
Stichproben = 106 Pat.
Dauer12 Wochen
KontrollePlacebo-Spray als Add-on zur optimierten…
EndpunktNRS-Responderrate ≥30%
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Applikationoromukosal
Kernaussage
THC:CBD-Spray zeigte signifikant bessere Verbesserung der MS-Spastizität verglichen mit Placebo (77,4% vs. 32,1% klinisch relevante Responder; p < 0,0001).
Zusammenfassung
SAVANT-Studie: n=106 MS-Patienten mit resistenter Spastik, randomisiert zu THC:CBD-Spray (n=53) vs. Placebo (n=53) über 12 Wochen. Primärer Endpunkt (≥30% NRS-Verbesserung): 77,4% vs. 32,1% (p<0.0001). Signifikante Verbesserung Spastik-NRS (p<0.0001), Schmerz-NRS (p=0.0013), Modified Ashworth Scale (p=0.0007).
P
PopulationErwachsene mit moderater bis schwerer multipler Sklerose-Spastik, therapieresistent, n=106 (randomisiert in Phase B)
I
InterventionTHC:CBD-Oromukosal-Spray (Sativex®) als Add-on-Therapie, 12 Wochen, optimierte Begleitmedikation erlaubt
C
KontrollePlacebo-Spray als Add-on zur optimierten Basisantispastik
O
OutcomeAnteil klinisch relevanter Responder (≥30% NRS-Verbesserung) nach 12 Wochen: 77,4% (THC:CBD) vs. 32,1% (Placebo), p<0,0001
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Hoch
Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
★★★★★
Verblindung
Doppelblind
Effektstärke
Klarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
★★★★★
Autoren
Teilen
Abstract
Purpose/aim: To evaluate the efficacy of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC):cannabidiol (CBD) oromucosal spray (Sativex((R))) as add-on therapy to optimised standard antispasticity treatment in patients with moderate to severe multiple sclerosis (MS) spasticity.
Methods: Sativex((R)) as add-on therapy vs. further optimised first-line ANTispastics (SAVANT) was a two-phase trial. In Phase A, eligible patients received add-on THC:CBD spray for 4 weeks to identify initial responders [>/=20% improvement from baseline in spasticity 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) score]. Following washout, eligible initial responders were randomised to receive THC:CBD spray or placebo for 12 weeks (double-blinded, Phase B). Optimisation of underlying antispasticity medications was permitted in both groups across all study periods.
Results: Of 191 patients who entered Phase A, 106 were randomised in Phase B to receive add-on THC:CBD spray (n = 53) or placebo (n = 53). The proportion of clinically relevant responders after 12 weeks (>/=30% NRS improvement; primary efficacy endpoint) was significantly greater with THC:CBD spray than placebo (77.4 vs. 32.1%; p < 0.0001). Compared with placebo, THC:CBD spray also significantly improved key secondary endpoints: changes in mean spasticity NRS (p < 0.0001), mean pain NRS (p = 0.0013), and mean modified Ashworth's scale (p = 0.0007) scores from Phase B baseline to week 12. Adverse events, when present, were mild/moderate and without new safety concerns.
Conclusions: Add-on THC:CBD oromucosal spray provided better and clinically relevant improvement of resistant MS spasticity compared with adjusting first-line antispasticity medication alone.
„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“