Studienlage · Detail
Kein Nutzen nachgewiesen
GRADE
Hoch
128 Zitate
Stichproben = 493 Pat.
Dauer36 months
KontrollePlacebo
EndpunktEDSS-Progression
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidthc
Max. Dosis28.0 mg
Applikationoral
Kernaussage
Dronabinol zeigte keinen signifikanten Effekt auf die Progression der progressiven Multiplen Sklerose (HR 0,92; p=0,57).
Zusammenfassung
CUPID-Trial: multizentrische RCT (n=493, davon n=329 Dronabinol, n=164 Placebo) über 36 Monate bei progressiver MS. Primärer Endpunkt EDSS-Progression: HR 0,92 (95% CI 0,68–1,23; p=0,57) — kein signifikanter Effekt auf Krankheitsprogression. Mittlere jährliche MSIS-29-PHYS-Veränderung 0,62 Punkte (Dronabinol) vs. 1,03 Punkte (Placebo).
P
PopulationErwachsene (18–65 Jahre) mit primär oder sekundär progressiver Multipler Sklerose, n=493 (ausgewertet: 329 Dronabinol, 164 Placebo)
I
InterventionOrales Dronabinol (Delta-9-THC), max. 28 mg/Tag, gewichts- und verträglichkeitsadaptierte Titration
C
KontrollePlacebo (identisches orales Präparat)
O
OutcomeKein signifikanter Unterschied in der EDSS-Progression (HR 0,92; 95%-KI 0,68–1,23; p=0,57); mittlere jährliche Änderung MSIS-29-PHYS: −0,9 Punkte (95%-KI −2,0 bis 0,2) zugunsten Dronabinol, nicht signifikant
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Hoch
Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
★★★★★
Verblindung
Doppelblind
Effektstärke
Kein Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
★★★★★
Autoren
Teilen
Abstract
Background: Laboratory evidence has shown that cannabinoids might have a neuroprotective action. We investigated whether oral dronabinol (Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol) might slow the course of progressive multiple sclerosis.
Methods: In this multicentre, parallel, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we recruited patients aged 18-65 years with primary or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis from 27 UK neurology or rehabilitation departments. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive dronabinol or placebo for 36 months; randomisation was by stochastic minimisation, using a computer-generated randomisation sequence, balanced according to expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score, centre, and disease type. Maximum dose was 28 mg per day, titrated against bodyweight and adverse effects. Primary outcomes were EDSS score progression (masked assessor, time to progression of >/=1 point from a baseline score of 4.0-5.0 or >/=0.5 points from a baseline score of >/=5.5, confirmed after 6 months) and change from baseline in the physical impact subscale of the 29-item multiple sclerosis impact scale (MSIS-29-PHYS). All patients who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. This trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial (ISRCTN 62942668).
Findings: Of the 498 patients randomly assigned to a treatment group, 329 received at least one dose of dronabinol and 164 received at least one dose of placebo (five did not receive the allocated intervention). 145 patients in the dronabinol group had EDSS score progression (0.24 first progression events per patient-year; crude rate) compared with 73 in the placebo group (0.23 first progression events per patient-year; crude rate); HR for prespecified primary analysis was 0.92 (95% CI 0.68-1.23; p=0.57). Mean yearly change in MSIS-29-PHYS score was 0.62 points (SD 3.29) in the dronabinol group versus 1.03 points (3.74) in the placebo group. Primary analysis with a multilevel model gave an estimated between-group difference (dronabinol-placebo) of -0.9 points (95% CI -2.0 to 0.2). We noted no serious safety concerns (114 [35%] patients in the dronabinol group had at least one serious adverse event, compared with 46 [28%] in the placebo group).
Interpretation: Our results show that dronabinol has no overall effect on the progression of multiple sclerosis in the progressive phase. The findings have implications for the design of future studies of progressive multiple sclerosis, because lower than expected progression rates might have affected our ability to detect clinical change.
Funding: UK Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme, Multiple Sclerosis Society, and Multiple Sclerosis Trust.
„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“