Chronischer Schmerz
Studienlage · Detail Kohortenstudie · Chronischer Schmerz · 2019

Pills to Pot: Observational Analyses of Cannabis Substitution Among Medical Cannabis Users With Chronic Pain

Klarer Nutzen GRADE Niedrig 141 Zitate
Stichproben = 1.321 Pat.
Dauerlaufende Online-Befragung…
EndpunktCannabis-Substitution von…
Verblindungn.a.
DesignKohortenstudie
Kernaussage

Etwa 80% der Teilnehmer berichteten, Cannabis für traditionelle Schmerzmittel zu substituieren (53% für Opioide, 22% für Benzodiazepine), mit Angabe von weniger Nebenwirkungen und besserer Symptomkontrolle als Gründe.

Zusammenfassung

n=1.321 medizinische Cannabis-Nutzer mit chronischem Schmerz (59% weiblich, 54% ≥50 Jahre); 80% berichteten Cannabis-Substitution für traditionelle Schmerzmittel (53% für Opioide, 22% für Benzodiazepine), Begründung: weniger Nebenwirkungen und besseres Symptommanagement. Erfahrene Nutzer (≥1 Jahr) vs. Novizen (<1 Jahr): häufiger keine Begleitmedikation (43% vs. 30%) und verbesserte Gesundheit (74% vs. 67%, p=0.004).

P
PopulationErwachsene mit chronischem Schmerz und medizinischer Cannabis-Lizenz, n=1.321, 59% weiblich, 54% ≥50 Jahre
I
InterventionMedizinisches Cannabis (fortlaufende Online-Befragung, verschiedene Formen/Dosierungen)
O
OutcomeCa. 80% berichteten Cannabis-Substitution traditioneller Schmerzmedikamente (53% für Opioide, 22% für Benzodiazepine); erfahrene Nutzer häufiger ohne Komedikation (43% vs. 30%) und häufiger mit verbesserter Gesundheit (74% vs. 67%, p=0,004)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Niedrig

Zweite von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist begrenzt verlässlich.

Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung
Effektstärke Klarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Boehnke K F, Scott J R, Litinas E et al.
DOI 10.1016/j.jpain.2019.01.010
Design: Kohortenstudie
Teilen
Abstract
Chronic pain is common, costly, and challenging to treat. Many individuals with chronic pain have turned to cannabis as an alternative form of pain management. We report results from an ongoing, online survey of medical cannabis users with chronic pain nationwide about how cannabis affects pain management, health, and pain medication use. We also examined whether and how these parameters were affected by concomitant recreational use, and duration of use (novice: <1 year vs experienced: >/=1 year). There were 1,321 participants (59% female, 54% >/=50 years old) who completed the survey. Consistent with other observational studies, approximately 80% reported substituting cannabis for traditional pain medications (53% for opioids, 22% for benzodiazepines), citing fewer side effects and better symptom management as their rationale for doing so. Medical-only users were older (52 vs 47 years old; P < .0001), less likely to drink alcohol (66% vs 79%, P < .0001), and more likely to be currently taking opioids (21% vs 11%, P < .0001) than users with a combined recreational and medical history. Compared with novice users, experienced users were more likely to be male (64% vs 58%; P < .0001), take no concomitant pain medications (43% vs 30%), and report improved health (74% vs 67%; P = .004) with use. Given that chronic pain is the most common reason for obtaining a medical cannabis license, these results highlight clinically important differences among the changing population of medical cannabis users. More research is needed to better understand effective pain management regimens for medical cannabis users. Perspective: This article presents results that confirm previous clinical studies suggesting that cannabis may be an effective analgesic and potential opioid substitute. Participants reported improved pain, health, and fewer side effects as rationale for substituting. This article highlights how use duration and intentions for use affect reported treatment and substitution effects.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel