Studienlage · Detail
Kein Nutzen nachgewiesen
GRADE
Hoch
48 Zitate
Stichprobek = 36 Studien
DauerPublikationen bis November 2018
EndpunktÜbergang zur Psychose
Verblindungunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse
Kernaussage
Cannabiskonsum war nicht signifikant mit Transition zu Psychose assoziiert (RR = 1,11, 95% KI = 0,89-1,37); für andere Outcomes limitierte Evidenz.
Zusammenfassung
Systematische Review zu Cannabis bei Clinical High Risk (CHR) für Psychose, k=36 Studien. Lifetime-Cannabis-Prävalenz 48,7%, aktuelle Nutzung 25,8%, Cannabis Use Disorder 14,9%. Gepooltes relatives Risiko für Psychose-Transition RR=1,11 (95% CI 0,89–1,37, nicht signifikant). Alle Cannabis-Prävalenzen mit hoher Heterogenität (I²=75,7–92,8%).
P
PopulationPersonen mit klinisch hohem Psychose-Risiko (CHR), gepoolte Stichprobe aus 36 Studien, Durchschnittsalter 20,1 Jahre, 58,4% männlich
I
InterventionCannabiskonsum (verschiedene Verwendungsmuster: Lifetime-Konsum, aktueller Konsum, Cannabis-Use-Disorder)
O
OutcomeLebenszeitprävalenz Cannabiskonsum 48,7%; aktueller Konsum 25,8%; Cannabis-Use-Disorder 14,9%; gepooltes relatives Risiko für Übergang in Psychose RR=1,11 (95%-KI 0,89–1,37), nicht signifikant; heterogenität 75,7–92,8%
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Hoch
Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
★★★★★
Verblindung
—
Effektstärke
Kein Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
★★★★★
Autoren
Teilen
Abstract
Purpose: The objectives of this review were to understand the prevalence of cannabis use and how cannabis is associated with transition to psychosis, symptoms, cognition, trauma and family history in clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis individuals.
Method: A systematic literature review was conducted to find studies that examined cannabis use in CHR individuals, with no limitations on the geographical area, and included publications up to November 2018. Studies were screened for inclusion based on detailed criteria, and data were extracted on cannabis use and associated outcomes. A quantitative synthesis by meta-analysis was performed where appropriate, otherwise, a qualitative synthesis was conducted.
Results: Overall, 36 studies met inclusion criteria with an average age of 20.1 years and 58.4% males. Prevalence of lifetime cannabis use was 48.7%, whereas current cannabis use was 25.8% and the prevalence of cannabis use disorder/abuse or dependence was 14.9% across the studies. All cannabis use results had statistically significant heterogeneity ranging from 75.7 to 92.8%. The most commonly reported association with cannabis use was transition to psychosis, although the pooled relative risk (RR) was not statistically significant (RR = 1.11, 95% confidence interval = 0.89-1.37). For all other outcomes including symptoms, cognition, trauma, and family history, the evidence was limited, and therefore, the results were synthesized qualitatively.
Conclusion: Almost half of CHR individuals have ever used cannabis. However, cannabis use has not been thoroughly researched regarding frequency and dose of use, and how other factors, such as symptoms, are associated with cannabis in CHR individuals.
„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“