Epilepsie
Studienlage · Detail Meta-Analyse (Beobachtungsstudien) · Epilepsie · 2018

Potential Clinical Benefits of CBD-Rich Cannabis Extracts Over Purified CBD in Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy: Observational Data Meta-analysis

Gemischt GRADE Hoch 178 Zitate
Stichprobek = 11 Studien
n = 670 Pat.
Dauer3 bis 12 Monate
KontrolleAufgereinigtes CBD
EndpunktAnfallsfrequenzreduktion
Verblindungn.a.
DesignMeta-Analyse (Beobachtungsstudien)
Cannabinoidcbd
Applikationoral
Kernaussage

CBD-reiche Extrakte zeigen bei subjektiver Anfallsfrequenzverbesserung Vorteile gegenüber purifiziertem CBD, nicht jedoch beim ≥50%-Responder-Kriterium.

Zusammenfassung

Meta-Analyse von k=11 Beobachtungsstudien (n=670) zu CBD-Produkten bei refraktärer Epilepsie; 64% der Patienten berichteten Anfallsverbesserung (399/622); CBD-reiche Extrakte zeigten höhere Verbesserungsrate als reines CBD (71% vs. 46%, p<0,0001); Responder-Rate (≥50% Anfallsreduktion) 39% ohne Produktunterschied (p=0,52); schwere UAW unter reinem CBD häufiger (26% vs. 7%, p<0,0001).

P
PopulationPatienten mit therapierefraktärer Epilepsie (u.a. Dravet-Syndrom, Lennox-Gastaut), gepooltes n=670
I
InterventionCBD-reiche Cannabis-Extrakte vs. aufgereinigtes (purified) CBD, oral, Ø-Dosis 6,0 vs. 25,3 mg/kg/Tag
C
KontrolleAufgereinigtes CBD (purified CBD)
O
OutcomeAnfallsverbesserung (subjektiv) häufiger bei CBD-Extrakten (71% vs. 46%, p<0,0001); bei ≥50%-Anfallsreduktion kein Unterschied (37% vs. 42%, p=0,52); weniger Nebenwirkungen unter CBD-Extrakten
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Hoch

Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.

Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung
Effektstärke Gemischt
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Pamplona F A, da Silva L R, Coan A C
DOI 10.3389/fneur.2018.00759
Design: Meta-Analyse (Beobachtungsstudien)
Teilen
Abstract
This meta-analysis paper describes the analysis of observational clinical studies on the treatment of refractory epilepsy with cannabidiol (CBD)-based products. Beyond attempting to establish the safety and efficacy of such products, we also investigated if there is enough evidence to assume any difference in efficacy between CBD-rich extracts compared to purified CBD products. The systematic search took place in February/2017 and updated in December/2017 using the keywords "epilepsy" or "Dravet" or "Lennox-Gastaut" or "CDKL5" combined with "Cannabis," "cannabinoid," "cannabidiol," or "CBD" resulting in 199 papers. The qualitative assessment resulted in 11 valid references, with an average impact factor of 8.1 (ranging from 1.4 to 47.8). The categorical data of a total of 670 patients were analyzed by Fischer test. The average daily dose ranged between 1 and 50 mg/kg, with treatment length from 3 to 12 months (mean 6.2 months). Two thirds of patients reported improvement in the frequency of seizures (399/622, 64%). There were more reports of improvement from patients treated with CBD-rich extracts (318/447, 71%) than patients treated with purified CBD (81/175, 46%), [corrected] with statistical significance (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Nevertheless, when the standard clinical threshold of a "50% reduction or more in the frequency of seizures" was applied, only 39% of the individuals were considered "responders," and there was no difference (<i>p</i> = 0.52) [corrected] between treatments with CBD-rich extracts (122/330, 37%) [corrected] and purified CBD (94/223, 42%). Patients treated with CBD-rich extracts reported lower average dose (6.0 mg/kg/day) [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] than those using purified CBD (25.3 mg/kg/day). [DOSAGE ERROR CORRECTED] The reports of mild (158/216 76% vs. 148/447, 33% <i>p</i> < 0.001) and severe (41/155, 26% vs. 23/328, 7% <i>p</i> < 0.0001) [corrected] adverse effects were more frequent in products containing purified CBD than in CBD-rich extracts. CBD-rich extracts seem to present a better therapeutic profile than purified CBD, at least in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy. The roots of this difference is likely due to synergistic effects of CBD with other phytocompounds (aka Entourage effect), but this remains to be confirmed in controlled clinical studies.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel