Neuropathie
Studienlage · Detail Real-World-Register (Propensity-Score-Matched) · Neuropathie · 2022

Comparison of the Effectiveness and Tolerability of Nabiximols (THC:CBD) Oromucosal Spray versus Oral Dronabinol (THC) as Add-on Treatment for Severe Neuropathic Pain in Real-World Clinical Practice: Retrospective Analysis of the German Pain e-Registry.

Klarer Nutzen GRADE Niedrig 20 Zitate
Stichproben = 674 Pat.
Dauer24 Wochen
KontrolleOrales Dronabinol als Add-on
EndpunktASR-9 Composite Score
Verblindungn.a.
DesignReal-World-Register (Propensity-Score-Matched)
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Max. Dosis16.6 mg
Applikationoromukosal
Kernaussage

Nabiximols war Dronabinol hinsichtlich aggregierter Symptomreduktion und Verträglichkeit bei schwerer neuropathischer Schmerzerkrankung signifikant überlegen.

Zusammenfassung

German Pain e-Registry: n=674 Patienten mit schwerer Neuropathie (337 Nabiximols vs. 337 Dronabinol, propensity-matched); ASR-9-Gesamtscore-Verbesserung 55.4% (NBX) vs. 40.5% (DRO), Differenz 14.0 (95% CI 12.6–15.4, p<0.001); UAW-Rate 21.1% vs. 35% (p<0.001); mehr NBX-Patienten setzten Opioid-Begleitmedikation ab (p<0.001) — NBX sowohl nicht-inferior als auch superior gegenüber DRO.

P
PopulationErwachsene ambulante Patienten mit schwerer neuropathischer Schmerzerkrankung, unzureichendes Ansprechen auf etablierte Therapien, Propensity-Score-gematchte Stichprobe: n=337 (NBX) vs. n=337 (DRO)
I
InterventionNabiximols (THC:CBD) oromukosales Spray (mittlere THC-Dosis 16,6 mg/Tag) als Add-on über 24 Wochen
C
KontrolleOrales Dronabinol (synthetisches THC, mittlere Dosis 17,2 mg/Tag) als Add-on
O
OutcomeMediane Verbesserung im ASR-9-Composite-Score: 55,4% (NBX) vs. 40,5% (DRO); LS-Mean-Differenz 14,0 (95%-KI 12,6–15,4; p<0,001); TRAE-Inzidenz: 21,1% vs. 35% (p<0,001); TRAE-bedingte Abbrüche: 5,9% vs. 14,8% (p<0,001)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Niedrig

Zweite von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist begrenzt verlässlich.

Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung
Effektstärke Klarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Ueberall MA, Essner U, Vila Silván C, Mueller-Schwefe GHH.
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s340968
Design: Real-World-Register (Propensity-Score-Matched)
Teilen
Abstract
<h4>Purpose</h4>To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of add-on treatment with nabiximols (NBX: delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol: cannabidiol) oromucosal spray or oral dronabinol (DRO: synthetic tetrahydrocannabinol) in patients with severe neuropathic pain poorly responsive to established treatments.<h4>Methods</h4>An analysis was conducted of anonymized, propensity score-matched real-world data from the German Pain e-Registry, using a sequential non-inferiority superiority approach, for adult outpatients with neuropathic pain who had initiated treatment with NBX or DRO between 10 March 2017 and 31 December 2019. The primary effectiveness variable was percent change from baseline in a 9-factor aggregated symptom relief (ASR-9) score, a composite index of nine distinct pain- and health-related parameters assessed using validated patient-reported instruments. Safety was assessed by the incidence of physician-confirmed treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and TRAEs leading to discontinuation.<h4>Results</h4>Propensity score-matched data were analyzed for 337 patients treated with NBX and 337 patients treated with DRO. Mean (standard deviation) THC dose over the 24-week evaluation period was 16.6 (6.5) mg for NBX and 17.2 (7.6) mg for DRO (p<0.001). Median (standard error) improvement relative to baseline in the ASR-9 composite score was 55.4% (0.5) for NBX and 40.5% (0.5) for DRO (least squares mean difference, 14.0 (0.7), 95% confidence interval 12.6-15.4; p<0.001), and incidences of TRAEs (21.1 vs 35%) and TRAE-related discontinuations (5.9 vs 14.8%) were significantly lower with NBX than DRO (p<0.001 for both), collectively indicating pre-specified non-inferiority and superiority of NBX. More NBX- than DRO-treated patients discontinued non-cannabinoid background pain medications and rescue analgesics, especially opioid analgesics (p<0.001 for both).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Add-on treatment with cannabinoids is effective for treatment of severe neuropathic pain with inadequate response to established treatments. In daily practice, NBX had superior effectiveness and tolerability compared to DRO. The results emphasize the importance of combining CBD with THC in this patient population.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel