Efficacy of dronabinol alone and in combination with ondansetron versus ondansetron alone for delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.
Meiri et al.·Current Medical Research and OpinionImpact 2.8
Klarer NutzenGRADEModerat213 Zitate
Stichproben = 61 Pat.
Dauer5 Tage
KontrolleOndansetron allein sowie Placebo
EndpunktTotal Response
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT (doppelblind, placebokontrolliert)
Cannabinoidthc
Max. Dosis40.0 mg
Applikationoral
”Kernaussage
Dronabinol und Ondansetron zeigten ähnliche Wirksamkeit mit höheren Ansprechraten (47-58%) gegenüber Placebo (20%), während die Kombinationstherapie nicht überlegen war.
Zusammenfassung
Doppelblinde, placebokontrollierte RCT (n=61) zu Dronabinol vs. Ondansetron vs. Kombinationstherapie bei verzögerter chemotherapiebedingter Übelkeit und Erbrechen (CINV). Gesamtansprechen (Total Response): Dronabinol 54%, Ondansetron 58%, Kombination 47%, Placebo 20%. Übelkeit-Abwesenheit signifikant höher unter aktiver Behandlung (Dronabinol 71%, Ondansetron 64%, Kombination 53%) vs. Placebo 15% (p<0,05 für alle vs. Placebo). Dronabinol war Ondansetron gleichwertig; Kombinationstherapie zeigte keinen Zusatznutzen.
P
PopulationPatienten unter moderat bis hoch emetogener Chemotherapie, n=61 (analysiert für Wirksamkeit), randomisiert n=64
I
InterventionDronabinol (2,5–20 mg, flexibel dosiert, oral) allein oder in Kombination mit Ondansetron (8–16 mg)
C
KontrolleOndansetron allein (8–16 mg) sowie Placebo; alle Gruppen erhielten Dexamethason und Ondansetron i.v. am Tag 1
O
OutcomeTotal Response (TR): Dronabinol 54%, Ondansetron 58%, Kombination 47% vs. Placebo 20%; Nausea-Abwesenheit signifikant häufiger in allen Aktivgruppen vs. Placebo (p<0,05)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Sehr niedrigNiedrigModeratHoch
Moderat
Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.
Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe★★★★★
VerblindungDoppelblind
EffektstärkeKlarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr★★★★★
Autoren
Meiri E, Jhangiani H, Vredenburgh JJ, Barbato LM, Carter FJ, Yang HM, Baranowski V
To compare the efficacy and tolerability of dronabinol, ondansetron, or the combination for delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in a 5-day, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Patients receiving moderately to highly emetogenic chemotherapy received dexamethasone (20 mg PO), ondansetron (16 mg IV) and either placebo or dronabinol (2.5 mg) prechemotherapy on day 1. Patients randomized to active treatment (dronabinol and/or ondansetron) also received dronabinol (2.5 mg) after chemotherapy on day 1. On day 2, fixed doses of placebo, dronabinol (10 mg), ondansetron (16 mg), or combination therapy were administered. On days 3-5, patients received placebo, flexible doses of dronabinol (10-20 mg), ondansetron (8-16 mg), or dronabinol and ondansetron (10-20 mg dronabinol, 8-16 mg ondansetron). Total response (TR = nausea intensity <5 mm on visual analog scale, no vomiting/retching, no rescue antiemetic), nausea (occurrence and intensity) and vomiting/retching episodes. Sixty-four patients were randomized; 61 analyzed for efficacy. TR was similar with dronabinol (54%), ondansetron (58%), and combination therapy (47%) versus placebo (20%). Nausea absence was significantly greater in active treatment groups (dronabinol, 71%; ondansetron, 64%; combination therapy, 53%) versus placebo (15%; p < 0.05 vs. placebo for all). Nausea intensity and vomiting/retching were lowest in patients treated with dronabinol. Active treatments were well tolerated. The low number of patients due to slow enrollment limits the interpretation of these data. Dronabinol or ondansetron was similarly effective for the treatment of CINV. Combination therapy with dronabinol and ondansetron was not more effective than either agent alone. Active treatments were well tolerated.