Krebs
Studienlage · Detail Systematische Review + Meta-Analyse · Krebs · 2020

Cannabinoids for adult cancer-related pain: systematic review and meta-analysis

Kein Nutzen nachgewiesen GRADE Hoch 134 Zitate
Stichprobek = 5 Studien
n = 1.442 Pat.
Dauerunklar
KontrollePlacebo oder andere aktive…
EndpunktNRS
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignSystematische Review + Meta-Analyse
Kernaussage

Cannabinoide zeigten keinen signifikanten Unterschied zu Placebo bei der Schmerzlinderung (Numeric Rating Scale), aber erhöhtes Risiko für Nebenwirkungen wie Somnolenz und Schwindel.

Zusammenfassung

Systematische Review mit Meta-Analyse zu Cannabinoiden bei Krebs-assoziierten Schmerzen; k=5 RCTs (n=1442, alle niedriges Bias-Risiko). Kein Unterschied zwischen Cannabinoiden+Opioide vs. Placebo+Opioide in durchschnittlicher NRS-Schmerzreduktion (MD -0,21 [95% CI -0,48 bis 0,07], p=0,14); Phase-III-Subanalyse: MD -0,02 (95% CI -0,21 bis 0,16, p=0,80). Cannabinoide mit höherem Risiko für Somnolenz (OR 2,69 [95% CI 1,54–4,71], p<0,001) und Schwindel (OR 1,58 [95% CI 0,99–2,51], p=0,05); keine behandlungsassoziierten Todesfälle.

P
PopulationErwachsene mit krebsbedingtem Schmerz, gepoolt n=1460
I
InterventionCannabinoide (verschiedene) als Zusatz zu Opioiden
C
KontrollePlacebo oder andere aktive Vergleichssubstanzen
O
OutcomeKein signifikanter Unterschied in der NRS-Schmerzreduktion (MD -0,21; 95%-KI -0,48 bis 0,07; p=0,14); erhöhtes Risiko für Somnolenz (OR 2,69; p<0,001) und Schwindel (OR 1,58; p=0,05)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Hoch

Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.

Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung Doppelblind
Effektstärke Kein Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Boland EG, Bennett MI, Allgar V, Boland JW
DOI 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-002032
Design: Systematische Review + Meta-Analyse
Teilen
Abstract
Objectives: There is increased interest in cannabinoids for cancer pain management and legislative changes are in progress in many countries. This study aims to determine the beneficial and adverse effects of cannabis/cannabinoids compared with placebo/other active agents for the treatment of cancer-related pain in adults. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis to identify randomised controlled trials of cannabinoids compared with placebo/other active agents for the treatment of cancer-related pain in adults to determine the effect on pain intensity (primary outcome) and adverse effects, including dropouts. Searches included Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane and grey literature. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Results: We identified 2805 unique records, of which six randomised controlled trials were included in this systematic review (n=1460 participants). Five studies were included in the meta-analysis (1442 participants). All had a low risk of bias. There was no difference between cannabinoids and placebo for the difference in the change in average Numeric Rating Scale pain scores (mean difference -0.21 (-0.48 to 0.07, p=0.14)); this remained when only phase III studies were meta-analysed: mean difference -0.02 (-0.21 to 0.16, p=0.80). Cannabinoids had a higher risk of adverse events when compared with placebo, especially somnolence (OR 2.69 (1.54 to 4.71), p<0.001) and dizziness (OR 1.58 (0.99 to 2.51), p=0.05). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Dropouts and mortality rates were high. Conclusions: Studies with a low risk of bias showed that for adults with advanced cancer, the addition of cannabinoids to opioids did not reduce cancer pain. Trial Registration Number: CRD42018107662.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel