Übelkeit
Studienlage · Detail RCT (Phase II, doppelblind, placebokontrolliert) · Übelkeit · 2010

Preliminary efficacy and safety of an oromucosal standardized cannabis extract in chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting

Klarer Nutzen GRADE Moderat 154 Zitate
Stichproben = 16 Pat.
Dauer120 h post-chemotherapy period
KontrollePlacebo-Spray, zusätzlich zur…
EndpunktAnsprechrate
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT (Phase II, doppelblind, placebokontrolliert)
Cannabinoidkombination
Applikationoromukosal
Kernaussage

Cannabis-basiertes Medikament zeigte höhere komplette Ansprechrate gegen verzögerte chemotherapieinduzierte Übelkeit und Erbrechen (71,4% vs. 22,2% mit Placebo) und war gut verträglich.

Zusammenfassung

Pilot-RCT zu Cannabis-basiertem Medikament (THC+CBD oromucosal) vs. Placebo bei chemotherapie-induzierter Übelkeit/Erbrechen (CINV) trotz Standard-Antiemetika; n=16 (7 CBM, 9 Placebo). Complete Response bei 71,4% (CBM) vs. 22,2% (Placebo), Differenz 49,2% (95% CI 1%–75%), primär in der verzögerten Phase. Nur 1 Abbruch wegen Nebenwirkungen (CBM-Gruppe). Mittlere Tagesdosis 4,8 Sprays.

P
PopulationOnkologische Patienten mit Chemotherapie-induzierter Übelkeit und Erbrechen (CINV) trotz Standard-Antiemetika-Prophylaxe, n=16
I
InterventionOromukosales standardisiertes Cannabis-Extrakt (CBM; THC + CBD, Ganpflanzenextrakt), akute Dosistitration, Sprays über 120 h post-Chemotherapie, zusätzlich zur Standard-Antiemetika-Therapie; mittlere Tagesdosis 4,8 Sprays
C
KontrollePlacebo-Spray (ebenfalls 4,8 Sprays/Tag), zusätzlich zur Standard-Antiemetika-Therapie
O
OutcomeVollständiges Ansprechen (complete response) in der CBM-Gruppe 71,4 % (5/7) vs. 22,2 % (2/9) in der Placebo-Gruppe; Differenz 49,2 % (95 % KI: 1 %, 75 %), getrieben durch die verzögerte CINV-Phase
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Moderat

Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.

Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung Doppelblind
Effektstärke Klarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Duran M, Pérez E, Abanades S et al
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03743.x
Design: RCT (Phase II, doppelblind, placebokontrolliert)
Teilen
Abstract
Aims: Despite progress in anti-emetic treatment, many patients still suffer from chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This is a pilot, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial designed to evaluate the tolerability, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of an acute dose titration of a whole-plant cannabis-based medicine (CBM) containing delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol, taken in conjunction with standard therapies in the control of Cinv. Methods: Patients suffering from CINV despite prophylaxis with standard anti-emetic treatment were randomized to CBM or placebo, during the 120 h post-chemotherapy period, added to standard anti-emetic treatment. Tolerability was measured as the number of withdrawals from the study during the titration period because of adverse events (AEs). The endpoint for the preliminary efficacy analysis was the proportion of patients showing complete or partial response. Results: Seven patients were randomized to CBM and nine to placebo. Only one patient in the CBM arm was withdrawn due to AEs. A higher proportion of patients in the CBM group experienced a complete response during the overall observation period [5/7 (71.4%) with CMB vs. 2/9 (22.2%) with placebo, the difference being 49.2% (95% CI 1%, 75%)], due to the delayed period. The incidence of AEs was higher in the CBM group (86% vs. 67%). No serious AEs were reported. The mean daily dose was 4.8 sprays in both groups. Conclusion: Compared with placebo, CBM added to standard antiemetic therapy was well tolerated and provided better protection against delayed CINV. These results should be confirmed in a phase III clinical trial.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel