Depression
Studienlage · Detail RCT · Depression · 2013

A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of venlafaxine-extended release for co-occurring cannabis dependence and depressive disorders.

Schaden GRADE Hoch 88 Zitate
Stichproben = 103 Pat.
Dauer12 Wochen
KontrollePlacebo plus wöchentliche kognitive…
EndpunktCannabisabstinenz + Hamilton…
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Kernaussage

Venlafaxin zeigte keinen Vorteil bei der Reduktion depressiver Symptome (63% vs. 69% Verbesserung) und führte zu signifikant schlechterer Cannabisabstinenz (11,8% vs. 36,5%) im Vergleich zu Placebo.

Zusammenfassung

n=103 Cannabis-abhängige Patienten mit komorbider Major Depression/Dysthymie, 12-wöchiges RCT Venlafaxin-XR (bis 375 mg) vs. Placebo + CBT. Klinisch signifikante Depressions-Verbesserung (≥50% HAM-D-Reduktion) hoch in beiden Gruppen: VEN-XR 63%, Placebo 69% (p=0.49, kein Unterschied). Cannabis-Abstinenz niedriger unter VEN-XR (11.8%) vs. Placebo (36.5%, p<0.01, OR=4.51 [95% CI: 1.53–13.3]). Stimmungsverbesserung korrelierte mit Cannabis-Reduktion nur in Placebo-Gruppe (p<0.01), nicht unter VEN-XR.

P
PopulationErwachsene mit DSM-IV-Cannabisabhängigkeit und gleichzeitiger Major Depression oder Dysthymie, n=103
I
InterventionVenlafaxin Extended Release (VEN-XR) bis 375 mg/Tag, 12 Wochen, plus wöchentliche kognitive Verhaltenstherapie
C
KontrollePlacebo plus wöchentliche kognitive Verhaltenstherapie
O
OutcomeKein signifikanter Unterschied in der Depressionsverbesserung (Hamilton-Score-Reduktion ≥50%: VEN-XR 63% vs. Placebo 69%, p=0.49); signifikant schlechtere Cannabisabstinenz unter VEN-XR (11,8% vs. 36,5%, p<0.01, OR=4,51, 95%-KI: 1,53–13,3)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Hoch

Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.

Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung Doppelblind
Effektstärke Schaden
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Levin FR, Mariani J, Brooks DJ, Pavlicova M, Nunes EV, Agosti V, Bisaga A, Sullivan MA, Carpenter KM
DOI 10.1111/add.12108
Design: RCT
Teilen
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate whether venlafaxine-extended release (VEN-XR) is an effective treatment for cannabis dependence with concurrent depressive disorders. Design: This was a randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of out-patients (n = 103) with DSM-IV cannabis dependence and major depressive disorder or dysthymia. Participants received up to 375 mg VEN-XR on a fixed-flexible schedule or placebo. All patients received weekly individual cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy that primarily targeted Cannabis use. Settings: The trial was conducted at two university research centers in the United States. Participants: One hundred and three cannabis-dependent adults participated in the trial. Measurements: The primary outcome measures were (i) abstinence from Cannabis defined as at least two consecutive urine-confirmed abstinent weeks and (ii) improvement in depressive symptoms based on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Findings: The proportion of patients achieving a clinically significant mood improvement (50% decrease in Hamilton Depression score from baseline) was high and did not differ between groups receiving VEN-XR (63%) and placebo (69%) (chi1 (2) = 0.48, P = 0.49). The proportion of patients achieving abstinence was low overall, but was significantly worse on VEN-XR (11.8%) compared to placebo (36.5%) (chi1 (2) = 7.46, P < 0.01; odds ratio = 4.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.53, 13.3). Mood improvement was associated with reduction in Cannabis use in the placebo group (F1,179 = 30.49, P < 0.01), but not the VEN-XR group (F1,186 = 0.02, P = 0.89). Conclusions: For depressed, cannabis-dependent patients, venlafaxine-extended release does not appear to be effective at reducing depression and may lead to an increase in cannabis use.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel