Studienlage · Detail
Klarer Nutzen
GRADE
Moderat
29 Zitate
Stichproben = 40 Pat.
Dauerzwei konsekutive, identische…
KontrolleNabilon 2 mg 2×/Tag + Placebo
EndpunktAnzahl Erbrechepisoden
Verblindungeinfachblind
DesignRCT (crossover)
Cannabinoidthc
Max. Dosis6.0 mg
Applikationoral
Kernaussage
Die Kombination von Nabilon und Dexamethason war Nabilon allein überlegen bei der Reduktion von Erbrechen-Episoden, mit weniger Hypotonie und besserer Patientenpräferenz (67% vs. 47%).
Zusammenfassung
n=40 Lungenkrebspatienten unter Chemotherapie (Crossover-RCT); Nabilon + Dexamethason (DXM) signifikant überlegen gegenüber Nabilon allein in der Reduktion von Erbrechen (p<0.05); ca. 63% vs. 47% ohne Nebenwirkungen; zwei Drittel der Patienten bevorzugten die Kombination.
P
PopulationPatienten mit Lungenkarzinom unter Chemotherapie, n=40
I
InterventionNabilon 2 mg 2×/Tag + Dexamethason 8–10 mg (oral/i.v.)
C
KontrolleNabilon 2 mg 2×/Tag + Placebo
O
OutcomeSignifikante Reduktion der Erbrechepisoden unter Nabilon + Dexamethason vs. Nabilon allein (p nicht explizit genannt, aber statistisch signifikant); kein signifikanter Unterschied bei Nausea-Schwere oder Appetit
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Moderat
Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.
Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
★★★★★
Verblindung
Einfachblind
Effektstärke
Klarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
★★★★★
Autoren
Teilen
Abstract
In a previous study on the antiemetic effect of nabilone (N) in patients with lung cancer receiving chemotherapy (CT), we found that N was only moderately effective and that its side effects limited its use, especially in elderly outpatients. We, therefore, performed a new study of N in combination with dexamethasone (DXM), a potent antiemetic in itself, to evaluate whether the addition of DXM to N would improve the antiemetic effect and/or reduce the side effects. Forty patients with lung cancer were enrolled in the study. A randomized, third-party-blinded, crossover design was used. Study drugs were given during two consecutive, identical CT cycles. N was given at a fixed dosage regimen of 2 mg b.i.d. The initial dose was administered the evening before CT, the second dose at 0.5 h before CT, and the third dose in the evening 12 h after CT. DXM, 8 mg, or placebo was given orally with the first dose of N. The subsequent doses (either 10 mg DXM or saline) were given intravenously 0.5 h before CT and at 2 and 6 h after the start of CT. The CT regimens given included the following drugs in various combinations: cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, etoposide (VP-16), vincristine, and vindesine. The combination of N and DXM was significantly superior to N alone in the reduction of vomiting episodes, both in subgroups of patients receiving cisplatin and in those receiving other CT combinations. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatments with regard to the patients' assessments of the severity of nausea or effects on appetite. Approximately half the patients (63% with N plus DXM versus 47% with N) reported no side effects. The frequency and severity of central nervous system adverse reactions, mainly vertigo, were similar in both treatment groups. The fall in blood pressure was significantly greater after N alone. Two thirds of the patients preferred N plus DXM. Thus, the addition of DXM to N enhanced the therapeutic yield of N, and we recommend DXM as an adjunct to N, when the use of steroids is not contraindicated.
„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“