Studienlage · Detail
Klarer Nutzen
GRADE
Hoch
34 Zitate
Stichprobek = 11 Studien
n = 10.873 Pat.
n = 10.873 Pat.
Dauerunklar
KontrolleNicht-Cannabisnutzer
EndpunktVAS
Verblindungunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse
Kernaussage
Cannabiskonsum war mit einer Abnahme der Schmerzintensität assoziiert (VAS-Schmerz baseline 8,2 vs 5,6 mm über Zeit; gepoolter Effekt -1,75).
Zusammenfassung
Systematische Review + Meta-Analyse zu Cannabis bei rheumatischen Erkrankungen (k=11, n=10.873); Fibromyalgie-Subgruppe (k=4, n=611) mit Cannabis-Konsumrate 68,2% (95% CI: 0,41–0,90). Schmerzreduktion VAS 8,2 (SD 2,9) zu Baseline vs. 5,6 (SD 3,5) mm im Verlauf; gepoolte Effektgröße -1,75 (95% CI: -2,75, -0,76). Cannabis-User jünger (58,4 vs. 63,6 Jahre, p<0,001), häufiger Raucher (OR 2,91) und arbeitslos (OR 2,40).
P
PopulationPatientinnen und Patienten mit rheumatologischen Erkrankungen (u.a. RA, Lupus, Fibromyalgie), gepoolt n=10.873
I
InterventionCannabiskonsum (selbst-therapeutisch, verschiedene Formen)
C
KontrolleNicht-Cannabisnutzer
O
OutcomeSignifikante Reduktion der Schmerzintensität bei Cannabisnutzern (VAS-Schmerz: 8,2 auf 5,6 mm; gepoolte Effektgröße -1,75 [95%-KI: -2,75; -0,76]); Cannabiskonsum-Inzidenz 40,4% (95%-KI: 0,28–0,54)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Hoch
Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
★★★★★
Verblindung
—
Effektstärke
Klarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
★★★★★
Autoren
Teilen
Abstract
Objectives: Despite classic analgesic or effective treatments in rheumatic diseases, such as synthetic DMARDs in RA, patients remain in pain and often turn to non-prescribed pharmacological alternatives, such as cannabis self-therapeutic use. However, this medical use of cannabis has not been thoroughly studied.
Methods: We performed a systematic literature review up to June 2020. The incidence of cannabis consumption was calculated by metaproportion. Differences between cannabis users and non-users were expressed as standardized mean differences using the inverse-variance method. We also assessed the effects of cannabis on pain.
Results: A total of 2900 patients reported cannabis consumption in a sample of 10 873 patients [incidence 40.4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28, 0.54)], and 15.3% (95% CI: 0.07, 0.27) specified that they were currently taking cannabis. Cannabis use was higher in the four fibromyalgia studies [68.2% (95% CI: 0.41, 0.90), n = 611] compared with seven articles concerning RA or lupus [26.0% (95% CI: 0.14, 0.41), n = 8168]. Cannabis consumption was associated with a decrease in pain intensity [VAS pain at baseline 8.2 (2.9) vs 5.6 (3.5) mm over time; pooled effect size -1.75 (95% CI: -2.75, -0.76)]. Cannabis users were younger [58.4 (11.4) vs 63.6 (12.1) years; P <0.001], more often smokers [OR 2.91 (95% CI: 1.84, 4.60)] or unemployed [OR 2.40 (95% CI: 1.31, 4.40)], and had higher pain intensity [5.0 (2.4) vs 4.1(2.6) mm; P <0.001] than non-users.
Conclusion: Nearly 20% of patients suffering from rheumatologic diseases actively consume cannabis, with an improvement in pain. The issue of cannabis use in the management of these patients should be addressed during medical consultation, essentially with cannabis-based standardized pharmaceutical products.
„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“