Neuropathie
Studienlage · Detail Meta-Analyse · Neuropathie · 2022

The Efficacy, Adverse Events, and Withdrawal Rates of the Pharmacological Management of Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Gemischt GRADE Moderat 18 Zitate
Stichprobek = 21 Studien
n = 6 Pat.
Dauer2 Wochen bis 4 Monate
KontrollePlacebo
EndpunktSchmerzintensität
Verblindungunklar
DesignMeta-Analyse
Kernaussage

Pregabalin zeigte Wirksamkeit gegen neuropathischen Schmerz, Lidocain in 2 von 3 Studien wirksam, Ketamin zeigte Effektivität (schlechte Qualität), Cannabinoide unwirksam; Nebenwirkungen häufige Ursache für Abbrüche.

Zusammenfassung

Systematische Review + Meta-Analyse zur Pharmakotherapie chronischer Rückenmarksverletzungs-Schmerzen; k=21 Studien für Wirksamkeitsanalyse, k=17 für Nebenwirkungen/Abbruchraten. Pregabalin wirksam bei neuropathischem Schmerz (3/3 Studien); Cannabinoide unwirksam bei neuropathischem Schmerz (1 Studie, 28,6% Abbruchrate). Pregabalin: erhöhtes Risiko für Somnolenz (RR 3,15, 95% CI 2,00–4,98) und Schwindel (RR 2,9, 95% CI 1,58–5,30).

P
PopulationErwachsene mit chronischem Rückenmarksverletzungsschmerz (Spinal Cord Injury Pain); gepoolt aus 21 Studien (Wirksamkeitsanalyse) bzw. 17 Studien (AE-/Abbruchanalyse)
I
InterventionPharmakologische Behandlung (Antikonvulsiva, Antidepressiva, Analgetika, Antispastika, Cannabinoide, Sonstige)
C
KontrollePlacebo (in den eingeschlossenen RCTs)
O
OutcomePregabalin wirksam bei neuropathischem Schmerz (3/3 Studien); Cannabinoide unwirksam (1/1 Studie); Abbruchrate unter Cannabinoiden 28,6%; Pregabalin erhöhtes Risiko für Somnolenz (RR 3,15; 95%-KI 2,00–4,98) und Schwindel (RR 2,9; 95%-KI 1,58–5,30)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Moderat

Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.

Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung
Effektstärke Gemischt
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Canavan C, Inoue T, McMahon S, Doody C, Blake C, Fullen BM
DOI 10.1093/pm/pnab140
Design: Meta-Analyse
Teilen
Abstract
Objective: To establish the efficacy of medications, incidence of adverse events (AEs), and withdrawal rates associated with the pharmacological management of chronic spinal cord injury pain. Methodology: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and PsycINFO were searched (November 2017) and updated (January 2020). Two independent review authors screened and identified papers for inclusion. Results: Twenty-one studies met inclusion requirements for efficacy analysis and 17 for AE and withdrawal rate analysis; no additional papers were included from the updated 2020 search. Treatments were divided into six categories: anticonvulsants (n = 6), antidepressants (n = 3), analgesics (n = 8), anti-spasticity medications (n = 2), cannabinoids (n = 1), and other (n = 2). Trials of anticonvulsants, antidepressants, and cannabinoids included long-term follow-up trials (2 weeks to 4 months), and trials of analgesics and anti-spasticity medications, among others, were short-term trials (0-2 days). Effectiveness for neuropathic pain was found for pregabalin (3/3 studies) and lidocaine (2/3 studies). Studies using ketamine also reported effectiveness (2/2), but the quality of these papers was rated as poor. The most frequently reported AEs included dizziness, dry mouth, nausea, and constipation. Pregabalin was associated with a higher risk of somnolence (risk ratio [RR] 3.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.00-4.98) and dizziness (RR 2.9, 95% CI: 1.58-5.30). Ketamine was associated with a higher risk of reduced vision (RR 9.00, 95% CI: 0.05-146.11), dizziness (RR 8.33, 95% CI: 1.73-40.10), and somnolence (RR 7.00, 95% CI: 1.73-40.1). Withdrawal rates ranged from 18.4% for antidepressants to 0-30% for anticonvulsants, 0-10% for anti-spasticity medications, 0-48% for analgesics, 28.6% for cannabinoids, and 0-22.2% for other medications. Conclusion: Pregabalin was found to be effective for neuropathic pain vs placebo. Cannabinoids were ineffective for neuropathic pain. AEs are a common cause for withdrawal. The nature of AEs was poorly reported, and AE reporting should be improved in future randomized controlled trials.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel