Long-COVID
Studienlage · Detail RCT · Long-COVID · 2024

A Single-Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Benefits and Safety of Endourage Targeted Wellness Formula C Sublingual +Drops in People with Post-Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 Syndrome.

Gemischt GRADE Niedrig 7 Zitate
Stichproben = 31 Pat.
Dauer28 Tage pro Behandlungsperiode…
KontrollePlacebo sublingual
EndpunktPROMIS-Score
Verblindungeinfachblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidcbd
Applikationoromukosal
Kernaussage

Beide Gruppen zeigten Verbesserungen bei PGIC- und PROMIS-Scores am Tag 28, aber die Placebokontrolle war kompromittiert, da die Placebo-Formulierung unerwartet hohe Terpen-Konzentrationen enthielt und kein echtes Placebo war.

Zusammenfassung

n=31 Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrom (PACS), CBD-reiches Vollspektrum-Präparat (Formula C) vs. Placebo über 28 Tage, dann Crossover zu Open-Label aktiv (weitere 28 Tage). n=24 Completers, 8 Abbrüche (nicht produktbezogen). PROMIS- und PGIC-Scores verbesserten sich in beiden Gruppen ab Tag 28; post-hoc Placebo-Analyse zeigte unerwartet medizinische Terpenen-Konzentrationen (kein echtes Placebo). Verbesserung persistierte in Open-Label-Phase. Keine Sicherheitsereignisse.

P
PopulationErwachsene mit Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrom (PACS), n=31 randomisiert (n=24 Studienabschluss)
I
InterventionEndourage Formula C: CBD-reiche, ganzblutige terpenreiche Zubereitung, sublingual, 28 Tage (doppelblind), dann 28 Tage offen
C
KontrollePlacebo sublingual (28 Tage; retrospektiv als unechtes Placebo mit Terpenen identifiziert)
O
OutcomePGIC- und PROMIS-Scores verbesserten sich in beiden Gruppen nach 28 Tagen; Verbesserungen blieben in der offenen Phase erhalten; kein echter Placebo-Vergleich möglich
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Niedrig

Zweite von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist begrenzt verlässlich.

Herabgestuft wegen
VerzerrungsrisikoUngenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung Einfachblind
Effektstärke Gemischt
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Young TP, Erickson JS, Hattan SL, Guzy S, Hershkowitz F, Steward MD
Teilen
Abstract
Introduction: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a wide range of symptoms, including death. As persons recover, some continue to experience symptoms described as Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome (PACS). The objectives of this study were to measure the efficacy of Formula C, a cannabidiol (CBD)-rich, whole-flower terpene-rich preparation in managing PACS symptoms. Materials and Methods: This randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind, open-label crossover study was conducted in 2021. Informed consent was obtained from participants, and they were randomized to two treatment groups. Group 1 (n=15) received blinded active product for 28 days, and Group 2 (n=16) received blinded placebo for 28 days (Treatment Period 1). Both groups crossed over to open-label active product for 28 days (Treatment Period 2) with a safety assessment at day 70. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS((R))) scores and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) score were used to assess primary and secondary objectives. Safety assessments were also done at each visit. Results: Twenty-four participants completed study, with 8 withdrawals, none related to study product. PGIC and PROMIS scores improved across both groups at day 28. This raised questions about the placebo. A reanalysis of the placebo confirmed absence of CBD and unexpected medical concentration of terpenes. The study continued despite no longer having a true placebo. The improved scores on outcome measures were maintained across the open label treatment period. There were no safety events reported throughout the study. Discussion: For persons with PACS who are nonresponsive to conventional therapies, this study demonstrated symptom improvement for participants utilizing Formula C. In addition, the benefits seen in Group 2 suggest the possibility that non-CBD formulations rich in antioxidants, omega-3, and omega-6 fatty acids, gamma-linoleic acid, and terpenes may also have contributed to the overall improvement of the partial active group through the study. Conclusion: Given that both groups demonstrated improvement, both formulations may be contributing to these findings. Limitations include the small number of participants, the lack of a true placebo, and limited time on study products. Additional studies are warranted to explore both CBD-rich hemp products and hempseed oil as treatment options for PACS. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04828668.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel