Studienlage · Detail
Gemischt
GRADE
Moderat
61 Zitate
Stichproben = 34 Pat.
DauerEinzelne Dosis, Messungen 2…
KontrollePlacebo
EndpunktGlx/GABA+
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidcbd
Max. Dosis600.0 mg
Applikationoral
Kernaussage
CBDV erhöhte Glutamat (Glx) signifikant in den Basalganglien beider Gruppen, jedoch nicht uniform; in der ASD-Gruppe korrelierte die Glx-Änderung negativ mit dem Ausgangswert. Keine signifikanten Effekte auf Glx im DMPFC oder auf GABA+ in beiden Regionen.
Zusammenfassung
n=34 (17 ASD, 17 Kontrollen), single-dose 600 mg CBDV vs. Placebo; CBDV erhöhte Glx in Basalganglien beider Gruppen; bei ASD korrelierte Glx-Shift negativ mit Baseline-Glx (r nicht berichtet). Kein signifikanter Effekt auf GABA+ oder präfrontales Glx.
P
PopulationErwachsene mit und ohne Autismus-Spektrum-Störung (ASD), ausschließlich Männer, n=34 (ASD n=17, typisch entwickelt n=17)
I
InterventionCBDV (Cannabidivarin) 600 mg, Einzeldosis, oral
C
KontrollePlacebo (Crossover-Design)
O
OutcomeCBDV erhöhte Glx (Glutamat+Glutamin) signifikant im linken Basalganglion beider Gruppen; kein signifikanter Effekt auf Glx im DMPFC oder auf GABA+ in beiden Regionen; in der ASD-Gruppe korrelierte der Glx-Shift negativ mit dem Baseline-Glx (nicht in Kontrollgruppe)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Moderat
Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.
Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
★★★★★
Verblindung
Doppelblind
Effektstärke
Gemischt
Zitate / Jahr
★★★★★
Autoren
Teilen
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a high cost neurodevelopmental condition; and there are currently no effective pharmacological treatments for its core symptoms. This has led some families and researchers to trial alternative remedies - including the non-intoxicating Cannabis sativa-derived compound cannabidivarin (CBDV). However, how CBDV affects the human brain is unknown. Previous (pre)clinical evidence suggests that CBDV may modulate brain excitatory-inhibitory systems, which are implicated in ASD. Hence, our main aim was to test, for the first time, if CBDV shifts glutamate and/or GABA metabolites - markers of the brain's primary excitatory and inhibitory system - in both the 'typical' and autistic brain. Our subsidiary aim was to determine whether, within ASD, brain responsivity to CBDV challenge is related to baseline biological phenotype. We tested this using a repeated-measures, double-blind, randomized-order, cross-over design. We used magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) to compare glutamate (Glx = glutamate + glutamine) and GABA + (GABA + macromolecules) levels following placebo (baseline) and 600 mg CBDV in 34 healthy men with (n = 17) and without (n = 17) ASD. Data acquisition from regions previously reliably linked to ASD (dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, DMPFC; left basal ganglia, BG) commenced 2 h (peak plasma levels) after placebo/CBDV administration. Where CBDV significantly shifted metabolite levels, we examined the relationship of this change with baseline metabolite levels. Test sessions were at least 13 days apart to ensure CBDV wash-out. CBDV significantly increased Glx in the BG of both groups. However, this impact was not uniform across individuals. In the ASD group, and not in the typically developing controls, the 'shift' in Glx correlated negatively with baseline Glx concentration. In contrast, CBDV had no significant impact on Glx in the DMPFC, or on GABA+ in either voxel in either group. Our findings suggest that, as measured by MRS, CBDV modulates the glutamate-GABA system in the BG but not in frontal regions. Moreover, there is individual variation in response depending on baseline biochemistry. Future studies should examine the effect of CBDV on behaviour and if the response to an acute dose of CBDV could predict a potential clinical treatment response in ASD.
„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“