Autismus
Studienlage · Detail Systematic Review · Autismus · 2023

A systematic review of cannabidiol trials in neurodevelopmental disorders.

Unklar GRADE Hoch 33 Zitate
Stichprobek = 9 Studien
Dauerunklar
KontrollePlacebo
EndpunktSicherheit und Wirksamkeit
Verblindungunklar
DesignSystematic Review
Cannabinoidcbd
Kernaussage

Einige Studien deuten auf potenzielle Wirksamkeit hin, aber die Befunde sind zu inkonsistent zwischen den RCTs, um klinische Anwendung zuverlässig zu leiten.

Zusammenfassung

Systematische Review zu CBD bei Neurodevelopmental Disorders (inkl. Autismus-Spektrum-Störung); k=9 RCTs identifiziert. Einige Studien zeigen potenzielle Wirksamkeit, jedoch zu inkonsistent über alle RCTs hinweg für klinische Empfehlung. Studiencharakteristika, Behandlungseigenschaften und Outcomes variieren stark; CBD-Eignung als pharmakologische Behandlung für Autismus bleibt weitgehend unbestimmt.

P
PopulationPersonen mit neurodevelopmentalen Störungen (ADHS, Autismus-Spektrum-Störung, intellektuelle Behinderung, Tourette-Syndrom, komplexe motorische Störungen)
I
InterventionCannabidiol (CBD)
C
KontrollePlacebo (innerhalb der eingeschlossenen RCTs)
O
OutcomeInkonsistente Hinweise auf potenzielle Wirksamkeit; keine zuverlässige Schlussfolgerung zur klinischen Eignung möglich
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Hoch

Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.

Qualitätsprofil
Größe
Verblindung
Effektstärke
Zitate / Jahr
Autoren
Parrella NF, Hill AT, Enticott PG, Barhoun P, Bower IS, Ford TC
DOI 10.1016/j.pbb.2023.173607
Design: Systematic Review
Teilen
Abstract
Cannabis-derived compounds, such as cannabidiol (CBD) and delta-9-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), are increasingly prescribed for a range of clinical indications. These phyto-cannabinoids have multiple biological targets, including the body's endocannabinoid system. There is growing scientific interest in the use of CBD, a non-intoxicating compound, to ameliorate symptoms associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. However, its suitability as a pharmaceutical intervention has not been reliably established in these clinical populations. This systematic review examines the nine published randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that have probed the safety and efficacy of CBD in individuals diagnosed with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, Tourette Syndrome, and complex motor disorders. Studies were identified systematically through searching four databases: Medline, CINAHL complete, PsycINFO, and EMBASE. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials involving CBD and participants with neurodevelopmental disorders. No publication year or language restrictions were applied. Relevant data were extracted from the identified list of eligible articles. After extraction, data were cross-checked between the authors to ensure consistency. Several trials indicate potential efficacy, although this possibility is currently too inconsistent across RCTs to confidently guide clinical usage. Study characteristics, treatment properties, and outcomes varied greatly across the included trials. The material lack of comparable RCTs leaves CBD's suitability as a pharmacological treatment for neurodevelopmental disorders largely undetermined. A stronger evidence base is urgently required to establish safety and efficacy profiles and guide the ever-expanding clinical uptake of cannabis-derived compounds in neurodevelopmental disorders. Prospero registration number: CRD42021267839.

„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“ — Marc Aurel