Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study of Nabiximols Oromucosal Spray as an Adjunctive Therapy in Advanced Cancer Patients with Chronic Uncontrolled Pain
Lichtman et al.·Journal of Pain and Symptom ManagementImpact 0.8
GemischtGRADEHoch232 Zitate
Stichproben = 397 Pat.
Dauerzwei Wochen Titration, gefolgt…
KontrollePlacebo-Spray
EndpunktNRS
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT (Phase III)
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD27:25
Applikationoromukosal
”Kernaussage
Nabiximols war nicht überlegen gegenüber Placebo beim primären Endpunkt (10,7% vs. 4,5% Schmerzverbesserung, p=0,0854), zeigte aber Vorteile bei mehreren sekundären Endpunkten, besonders bei US-amerikanischen Patienten und bei Lebensqualitätsmessungen.
Zusammenfassung
Phase-III-RCT zu Nabiximols (THC 27mg/mL + CBD 25mg/mL) vs. Placebo bei fortgeschrittenem Krebs mit chronischen Schmerzen trotz optimierter Opioid-Therapie; n=397 (Nabiximols n=199, Placebo n=198). ITT-Population: median 10,7% vs. 4,5% Schmerzreduktion (p=0,0854, primärer Endpunkt nicht signifikant). Per-Protokoll-Population: 15,5% vs. 6,3% (p=0,0378). Nabiximols signifikant überlegen bei 2/3 Lebensqualitäts-Instrumenten (Woche 3) und 3/3 (Woche 5). Post-hoc-Analyse: US-Patienten zeigten signifikante Vorteile auf multiplen sekundären Endpunkten.
P
PopulationErwachsene mit fortgeschrittenem Krebs und chronischem unkontrollierten Schmerz (NRS ≥4 und ≤8) trotz optimierter Opioidtherapie, n=397
I
InterventionNabiximols (Sativex®) oromukosales Spray (THC 27 mg/mL + CBD 25 mg/mL), selbsttitriert über 2 Wochen, dann 3 Wochen Behandlung bei titrierter Dosis
OutcomePrimärer Endpunkt (ITT): medianer prozentualer Rückgang des NRS-Schmerzscores 10,7% vs. 4,5% (p=0,0854, nicht signifikant); Per-Protokoll-Population: 15,5% vs. 6,3% (p=0,0378, signifikant)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Sehr niedrigNiedrigModeratHoch
Hoch
Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.
Qualitätsprofil
Größe★★★★★
VerblindungDoppelblind
EffektstärkeGemischt
Zitate / Jahr★★★★★
Autoren
Lichtman AH, Lux EA, McQuade R, Rossetti S, Sanchez R, Sun W, Wright S, Kornyeyeva E, Fallon MT
Context: Prior Phase 2/3 studies found that cannabinoids might provide adjunctive analgesia in advanced cancer patients with uncontrolled pain.
Objectives: To assess adjunctive nabiximols (Sativex((R))), an extract of Cannabis sativa containing two potentially therapeutic cannabinoids (Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol [27 mg/mL] and cannabidiol [25 mg/mL]), in advanced cancer patients with chronic pain unalleviated by optimized opioid therapy.
Methods: Phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with advanced cancer and average pain Numerical Rating Scale scores >/=4 and </=8 despite optimized opioid therapy. Patients randomized to nabiximols (n = 199) or placebo (n = 198) self-titrated study medications over a two-week period, followed by a three-week treatment period at the titrated dose.
Results: Median percent improvements in average pain Numerical Rating Scale score from baseline to end of treatment in the nabiximols and placebo groups were 10.7% vs. 4.5% (P = 0.0854) in the intention-to-treat population (primary variable) and 15.5% vs. 6.3% (P = 0.0378) in the per-protocol population. Nabiximols was statistically superior to placebo on two of three quality-of-life instruments at Week 3 and on all three at Week 5. In exploratory post hoc analyses, U.S. patients, but not patients from the rest of the world, experienced significant benefits from nabiximols on multiple secondary endpoints. Possible contributing factors to differences in nabiximols efficacy include: 1) the U.S. participants received lower doses of opioids at baseline than the rest of the world and 2) the subgroups had different distribution of cancer pain types, which may have been related to differences in pathophysiology of pain. The safety profile of nabiximols was consistent with earlier studies.
Conclusions: Although not superior to placebo on the primary efficacy endpoint, nabiximols had benefits on multiple secondary endpoints, particularly in the U.S.
Patients: Nabiximols might have utility in patients with advanced cancer who receive a lower opioid dose, such as individuals with early intolerance to opioid therapy.