Studienlage · Detail
Kein Nutzen nachgewiesen
GRADE
Hoch
39 Zitate
Stichprobek = 9 Studien
KontrolleNie-Cannabiskonsumenten
EndpunktOdds Ratio
Verblindungn.a.
DesignSystematische Review + Meta-Analyse (Fall-Kontroll-Studien)
Applikationinhalativ
Kernaussage
Es besteht kein statistisch signifikanter Zusammenhang zwischen lebenslangem Cannabiskonsum und dem Auftreten von Kopf-Hals-Karzinomen.
Zusammenfassung
Meta-Analyse aus k=9 Fall-Kontroll-Studien; ~12,6% der Fälle vs. 14,3% der Kontrollen waren Cannabiskonsumenten; kein Zusammenhang zwischen lebenslangem Cannabisgebrauch und Kopf-Hals-Krebsrisiko (OR=1,021; 95% CI 0,912–1,14; p=0,718).
P
PopulationPatienten mit Kopf-Hals-Karzinom vs. Kontrollpersonen; gepoolte Daten aus 9 Fall-Kontroll-Studien
I
InterventionCannabiskonsum (lebenslange Exposition, geraucht)
C
KontrolleNie-Cannabiskonsumenten (gematchte Kontrollen)
O
OutcomeKein signifikanter Zusammenhang zwischen Cannabiskonsum und Kopf-Hals-Karzinom (OR=1,021; 95%-KI 0,912–1,14; p=0,718)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Hoch
Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
★★★★★
Verblindung
—
Effektstärke
Kein Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
★★★★★
Autoren
DOI
10.1016/j.archoralbio.2015.09.009↗
Design: Systematische Review + Meta-Analyse (Fall-Kontroll-Studien)
Teilen
Abstract
<h4>Objectives</h4>The scientific literature presents conflicting data on a possible causal relationship between Cannabis users and the development of head and neck cancer.<h4>Design</h4>This study performed a systematic review with meta-analysis. Articles were selected from various electronic databases using keywords obtained from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). After reading by three reviewers and scoring of methodological quality, six articles (totaling nine case-control studies) were assessed with Comprehensive Meta-Analysis(®) software. The value of effect (odds ratio) was calculated, which represented the chance of developing head and neck cancer between individuals who had smoked Cannabis in their lifetime in models controlled for age, gender, race, and tobacco consumption.<h4>Results</h4>Approximately 12.6% of cases and 14.3% of controls were Cannabis users. The meta-analysis found no association between exposure and disease (OR=1.021; IC 95%=0.912-1.14; p=0.718).<h4>Conclusion</h4>No association between lifetime Cannabis use and the development of head and neck cancer was found. The different methods of collection/presentation of results in the selected articles prevented other analyzes from being conducted. Additional studies are needed to assess for long-term effects.
„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“