Medicinal cannabis for symptom control in advanced cancer: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial of 1:1 tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol.
Hardy et al.·Supportive care in cancerImpact 1.7
Kein Nutzen nachgewiesenGRADEHoch6 Zitate
Stichproben = 144 Pat.
Dauer28 Tage
KontrollePlacebo-Öl plus Palliativversorgung
EndpunktESAS – Total Symptom Distress…
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD1:1
Applikationoral
”Kernaussage
THC:CBD-Kombinationsöl zeigte keinen signifikanten Vorteil gegenüber Placebo bei der Gesamtsymptombelastung, mit nur kleinem Schmerznutzen, der durch größere psychomimetische Toxizität aufgewogen wurde.
Zusammenfassung
RCT (n=144) zu 1:1 THC:CBD-Öl (10 mg/ml) vs. Placebo bei fortgeschrittenem Krebs über 28 Tage; primärer Endpunkt Total Symptom Distress Score (TSDS) Tag 14: kein Unterschied zwischen Armen (MC -6.30±12.3, Placebo -6.98±12.56, p=0.76). ESAS-Schmerzscore signifikant für MC (MC -1.42±2.15, Placebo -0.46±2.83, p=0.04), aber höhere psychomimetische Toxizität. Global Impression of Change und Schmerz-QoL favorisierten MC.
P
PopulationErwachsene mit fortgeschrittenem Krebs unter Palliativversorgung, n=144
I
InterventionMedicinal Cannabis Öl 1:1 THC:CBD (10 mg/ml je Cannabinoid), Dosiseskalation über 14 Tage, dann Fortsetzung bis Tag 28
C
KontrollePlacebo-Öl plus Palliativversorgung
O
OutcomeKein signifikanter Unterschied im TSDS zwischen MC und Placebo an Tag 14 (−6,30 vs. −6,98; p=0,76); signifikante Schmerzreduktion im MC-Arm (ESAS Schmerz −1,42 vs. −0,46; p=0,04) bei erhöhter psychomimetischer Toxizität
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Sehr niedrigNiedrigModeratHoch
Hoch
Höchste von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist sehr verlässlich.
Purpose: Patients with cancer commonly access cannabis hoping to relieve their symptoms. This study assessed whether a 1:1 10 mg/ml THC:CBD combination oil could improve total symptom burden in patients with advanced cancer over that provided by palliative care alone.
Methods: Participants were randomised to medicinal cannabis (MC) or placebo oil; dose escalated over 14 days according to tolerance and efficacy and continued to day 28. Symptoms assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) were summated to give a total symptom distress score (TSDS). The primary outcome measure was the change from baseline in TSDS at day 14. Secondary outcomes included individual symptom scores, opioid use, participant-selected dose, QoL, psychological symptoms, global impression of change (GIC), and adverse effects.
Results: The pre-planned sample size of 120 at day 14 was reached following the randomisation of 144 patients. Mean (SD) TSDS improved over time in both arms (- 6.30 (12.3) MC, - 6.98 (12.56) placebo, p = 0.76) to day 14 with no difference between arms. A statistically significant improvement in ESAS pain scores in the MC arm (mean (SD) - 1.42 (2.15) MC and - 0.46 (2.83) placebo, p = 0.04) was at the expense of greater psychomimetic toxicity. Improvement in general well-being was greater for the placebo. GIC and the pain component of QoL both favoured
Mc. Conclusions: Patients can be informed that a 1:1 THC:CBD combination cannabis oil was no better than palliative care alone in palliating symptoms in patients with advanced cancer. A small benefit in pain control was associated with greater toxicity.
Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12619000037101, 14/01/2019.