A randomized trial of medical cannabis in patients with stage IV cancers to assess feasibility, dose requirements, impact on pain and opioid use, safety, and overall patient satisfaction.
Zylla et al.·Supportive care in cancerImpact 1.7
Klarer NutzenGRADEModerat63 Zitate
Stichproben = 30 Pat.
Dauer3 Monate
KontrolleVerzögerter Cannabisstart
EndpunktMachbarkeit
Verblindungoffen
DesignRCT
Cannabinoidkombination
THC:CBD2:1
Max. Dosis51.0 mg
Applikationoral
”Kernaussage
Höherer Anteil der Early Cannabis Patienten erreichte Reduktion der Opioid-Nutzung und verbesserte Schmerzkontrollen; keine ernsthaften Sicherheitsprobleme berichtet.
Zusammenfassung
Pilot-RCT bei n=30 Patienten mit Stadium-IV-Krebs unter Opioid-Therapie, randomisiert 1:1 zu Early Cannabis (EC) vs. Delayed Start (DC). Geschätzte mittlere tägliche THC/CBD-Dosen nach 3 Monaten: 34 mg THC und 17 mg CBD. Höherer Anteil der EC-Gruppe erreichte Opioid-Reduktion und verbesserte Schmerzkontrolle (numerische Werte im Abstract nicht spezifiziert). Keine schwerwiegenden Sicherheitsprobleme; hohe Patientenzufriedenheit. Machbarkeitsstudie für RCTs in staatlichen Cannabis-Programmen.
P
PopulationErwachsene mit fortgeschrittenem Karzinom (Stadium IV) unter Opioidtherapie, n=30
I
InterventionMedizinisches Cannabis (THC/CBD oral, mittlere Tagesdosis ~34 mg THC / ~17 mg CBD) über ein staatliches Programm für 3 Monate, Dosierung/Formulierung durch Apotheker individualisiert
C
KontrolleVerzögerter Cannabisstart (Standard-Onkologiepflege ohne MC für erste 3 Monate, n=15)
O
OutcomeHöherer Anteil an Patienten mit Opioidreduktion und verbesserter Schmerzkontrolle in der Early-Cannabis-Gruppe vs. Delayed-Cannabis-Gruppe (keine exakten p-Werte berichtet); keine schwerwiegenden Sicherheitsereignisse; hohe Patientenzufriedenheit
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Sehr niedrigNiedrigModeratHoch
Moderat
Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.
Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe★★★★★
VerblindungOffen
EffektstärkeKlarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr★★★★★
Autoren
Zylla DM, Eklund J, Gilmore G, Gavenda A, Guggisberg J, VazquezBenitez G, Pawloski PA, Arneson T, Richter S, Birnbaum AK
Purpose: The prevalence of medical cannabis (MC) use in patients with cancer is growing, but questions about safety, efficacy, and dosing remain. Conducting randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) using state-sponsored MC programs is novel and could provide data needed to guide patients and providers.
Methods: A pilot RCT of patients with stage IV cancer requiring opioids was conducted. Thirty patients were randomized 1:1 to early cannabis (EC, n = 15) versus delayed start cannabis (DC, n = 15). The EC group obtained 3 months (3 M) of MC through a state program at no charge, while the DC group received standard oncology care without MC for the first 3 M. Patients met with licensed pharmacists at one of two MC dispensaries to determine a suggested MC dosing, formulation, and route. Patients completed surveys on pain levels, opioid/MC use, side effects, and overall satisfaction with the study.
Results: Interest in the study was high as 36% of patients who met eligibility criteria ultimately enrolled. The estimated mean daily THC and CBD allotments at 3 M were 34 mg and 17 mg, respectively. A higher proportion of EC patients achieved a reduction in opioid use and improved pain control. No serious safety issues were reported, and patients reported high satisfaction.
Conclusion: Conducting RCTs using a state cannabis program is feasible. The addition of MC to standard oncology care was well-tolerated and may lead to improved pain control and lower opioid requirements. Conducting larger RCTs with MC in state-sponsored programs may guide oncology providers on how to safely and effectively incorporate MC for interested patients.