Studienlage · Detail
Unklar
GRADE
Moderat
146 Zitate
Stichprobek = 2 Studien
n = 71 Pat.
n = 71 Pat.
Dauer2 bis 5 Wochen
KontrollePlacebo oder Amitriptylin
EndpunktSchmerzreduktion
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignSystematic Review
Kernaussage
Die Befunde zur Überlegenheit von Cannabinoiden gegenüber Kontrollen (Placebo, Amitriptylin) waren inkonsistent; derzeit unzureichende Evidenz für eine Empfehlung.
Zusammenfassung
Systematische Review zu Cannabinoiden bei rheumatischen Schmerzerkrankungen; k=2 RCTs mit Nabilone bei Fibromyalgie (n=71, Studiendauer 2 und 4 Wochen). Überlegenheit von Cannabinoiden gegenüber Kontrollen (Placebo, Amitriptylin) nicht konsistent nachweisbar. Hohes Bias-Risiko in 3 von 4 eingeschlossenen Studien. Schlussfolgerung: unzureichende Evidenz für Empfehlung von Cannabinoid-Präparaten bei chronischen rheumatischen Schmerzen.
P
PopulationErwachsene mit chronischem Schmerz bei rheumatischen Erkrankungen (Fibromyalgie, chronischer Rückenschmerz, Rheumatoide Arthritis, Osteoarthritis), gepoolt n=159
I
InterventionCannabinoide (Nabilon, THC/CBD) oral/verschiedene Applikationen
C
KontrollePlacebo oder Amitriptylin
O
OutcomeInkonsistente Überlegenheit von Cannabinoiden gegenüber Kontrollen; unzureichende Evidenz für Empfehlung
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Moderat
Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.
Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
★★★★★
Verblindung
Doppelblind
Effektstärke
—
Zitate / Jahr
★★★★★
Autoren
Teilen
Abstract
Background: In the absence of an ideal treatment for chronic pain associated with rheumatic diseases, there is interest in the potential effects of cannabinoid molecules, particularly in the context of global interest in the legalization of herbal cannabis for medicinal use.
Methods: A systematic search until April 2015 was conducted in Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, www.cannabis-med.org and clinicaltrials.gov for randomized controlled trials with a study duration of at least 2 weeks and at least ten patients per treatment arm with herbal cannabis or pharmaceutical cannabinoid products in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS), osteoarthritis (OA), chronic spinal pain, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pain. Outcomes were reduction of pain, sleep problems, fatigue and limitations of quality of life for efficacy, dropout rates due to adverse events for tolerability, and serious adverse events for safety. The methodology quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was evaluated by the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.
Results: Two RCTs of 2 and 4 weeks duration respectively with nabilone, including 71 FMS patients, one 4-week trial with nabilone, including 30 spinal pain patients, and one 5-week study with tetrahydrocannbinol/cannabidiol, including 58 RA patients were included. One inclusion criterion was pain refractory to conventional treatment in three studies. No RCT with OA patients was found. The risk of bias was high for three studies. The findings of a superiority of cannabinoids over controls (placebo, amitriptyline) were not consistent. Cannabinoids were generally well tolerated despite some troublesome side effects and safe during the study duration.
Conclusions: Currently, there is insufficient evidence for recommendation for any cannabinoid preparations for symptom management in patients with chronic pain associated with rheumatic diseases.
„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“