Studienlage · Detail
Klarer Nutzen
GRADE
Moderat
55 Zitate
Stichproben = 38 Pat.
Dauerzwei konsekutive…
KontrolleDomperidon 20 mg oral, gleiches Schema
EndpunktAnzahl Erbrechemisoden
Verblindungdoppelblind
DesignRCT (randomisiert, doppelblind, aktiv-kontrolliert)
Cannabinoidthc
Max. Dosis3.0 mg
Applikationoral
Kernaussage
Nabilon reduzierte die Anzahl von Erbrechemisoden gegenüber Domperidon signifikant.
Zusammenfassung
n=38 Krebspatienten unter hoch-emetogener Chemotherapie (70% Cisplatin); Nabilon 1 mg 8-stündlich vs. Domperidon 20 mg; mittlere Erbrechepisoden Zyklus 1: Nabilon 4,76 vs. Domperidon 12,95 (p<0,02); Zyklen 1+2 kombiniert: 4,53 vs. 10,81 (p<0,01); Nabilon signifikant überlegen.
P
PopulationPatienten mit hochemetogener Chemotherapie (70% Cisplatin-haltig), n=38
I
InterventionNabilon (N) 1 mg oral, Nacht vor Chemotherapie und alle 8 Stunden an Chemotherapietagen, zwei Zyklen
C
KontrolleDomperidon (D) 20 mg oral, gleiches Schema
O
OutcomeMittlere Anzahl Erbrechemisoden Zyklus 1: N 4,76 vs. D 12,95 (p<0,02); kombiniert Zyklen 1+2: N 4,53 vs. D 10,81 (p<0,01)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Moderat
Dritte von vier GRADE-Stufen, die Effektschätzung ist wahrscheinlich verlässlich.
Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
★★★★★
Verblindung
Doppelblind
Effektstärke
Klarer Nutzen
Zitate / Jahr
★★★★★
Autoren
Teilen
Abstract
A prospective randomized double-blind trial comparing the butyrophenone analogue domperidone (D) and the synthetic cannabinoid nabilone (N) in the treatment of cytotoxic-induced emesis was conducted in 38 patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens (70% containing cisplatin). Patients received 20 mg D or 1 mg N the night before chemotherapy and 8-hourly on each chemotherapy day for two consecutive cycles of treatment. Three of 19 patients randomized to N completed only one cycle because of disease progression or subjectively adverse effects. Four of 19 patients completed only one cycle of D because of lack of efficacy or chemotherapy toxicity. In all, 32 cycles of N and 33 cycles of D were evaluable for efficacy. The mean number of vomiting episodes in cycle 1 was 4.76 for N and 12.95 for D (P less than 0.02). The corresponding values for cycle 2 were 4.27 and 7.69 (P greater than 0.10), and for cycles 1 and 2 combined, 4.53 for N and 10.81 for D (P less than 0.01). Nausea and food intake scores did not differ significantly, although there was a trend towards less nausea and an increased food intake with N. Subjectively adverse effects were more frequent with N and included drowsiness, dizziness, dry mouth, and postural hypotension. N is superior to D for the control of cytotoxic-induced emesis.
„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“