Studienlage · Detail
Gemischt
GRADE
Sehr niedrig
0 Zitate
Stichproben = 46 Pat.
Dauerunklar
KontrolleNicht-Cannabis-Nutzer mit…
EndpunktQOLIE-31
Verblindungn.a.
DesignKohortenstudie
Cannabinoidvollspektrum
Kernaussage
Cannabis-Nutzer zeigten bessere Werte im Subscore 'Energie und Müdigkeit', aber keinen signifikanten Unterschied im Gesamt-QOLIE-31-Score; negative Korrelation zwischen Gesamtscore und Cannabis-Use-Disorder.
Zusammenfassung
Beobachtungsstudie zu Lebensqualität (QOLIE-31) bei Cannabis-Nutzern vs. Nicht-Nutzern mit therapierefraktärer Epilepsie; n=46 (25 Cannabis-Nutzer, 21 Kontrollen). Signifikant höherer T-Subscore 'Energie und Müdigkeit' in Cannabis-Gruppe (p=0,004), aber kein Unterschied im Gesamt-T-Score (p=0,11). Signifikante negative Korrelation zwischen Gesamt-T-Score und Cannabis Use Disorder (p=0,032).
P
PopulationErwachsene mit pharmakoresistenter Epilepsie, n=46 (Cannabis-Nutzer n=25, Nicht-Nutzer n=21), tertiäres Epilepsiezentrum Kanada
I
InterventionArtisanales Cannabis (Beobachtung bestehender Nutzung, keine experimentelle Intervention)
C
KontrolleNicht-Cannabis-Nutzer mit pharmakoresistenter Epilepsie
O
OutcomeKein signifikanter Unterschied im QOLIE-31-Gesamtscore (p=0,11); signifikant höherer Subscore 'Energie und Fatigue' in der Cannabis-Gruppe (p=0,004); signifikante negative Korrelation zwischen Gesamtscore und Cannabis-Use-Disorder (p=0,032)
Vertrauen in die Evidenz
Sehr niedrig
Niedrigste GRADE-Stufe, die Effektschätzung bleibt unsicher.
Herabgestuft wegen
Ungenauigkeit
Qualitätsprofil
Größe
★★★★★
Verblindung
—
Effektstärke
Gemischt
Zitate / Jahr
★★★★★
Autoren
Teilen
Abstract
Objective: Very few publications have reported the impact of artisanal cannabis use on overall quality of life among people with drug-resistant epilepsy. This study aimed to evaluate the association of artisanal cannabis use among adults with drug-resistant epilepsy with quality of life, and to determine if an association exists between Quality-of-Life in Epilepsy Inventory-31 (QOLIE-31) 'T scores' and different clinical variables.
Methods: This study included patients admitted to a Canadian tertiary care epilepsy center as part of a larger study. These patients were confirmed to have drug-resistant epilepsy by an epileptologist at the Ambulatory Epilepsy Clinic. Patients were categorized into cannabis users (CAN group) (n = 25) and Non-cannabis users (Non-CAN group) (n = 21). Data was collected on RedCap(R) for epilepsy and cannabis use details. These were analyzed for an association using a binary multivariable logistic regression model between QOLIE-31 'T scores' and age, sex, epilepsy duration, age at initiation of use, duration of cannabis use and psychiatric related comorbidity for all patients. Additionally, different 'T subscores' of the questionnaire were compared between the CAN group and Non-CAN group.
Results: A statistically significant difference between the CAN group and Non-CAN group for the T subscore 'energy and fatigue' (p = .004) was found, with the CAN group scoring higher. However, for the 'overall T score' between the two groups there was no statically significant difference (p = .11). Additionally, a significant negative correlation between 'overall T score' and cannabis use disorder (p = .032) was found.
Significance: This study provides new data on association of quality of life in epilepsy with cannabis use and can serve as a foundation for larger future studies to better assess this association.
„Was dem Handeln im Weg steht, wird zum Weg.“